Automaton vs OpenText Business Processing Testing comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automaton and OpenText Business Processing Testing based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Automaton?
Srprogmagr567
Ranking
40th
Views
113
Comparisons
85
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
37th
Views
173
Comparisons
103
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing
Learn More
Overview

An illustrative test automation tool with a code-less approach towards end-to-end application testing. Visual flow-based approaches for test cases makes it tester-friendly.

Automaton is a test automation tool. Automaton uses a visual flowchart-based design interface. It enables end to end continuous test automation of all components in application development - Web, APIs, Logs and Database Processes/Operations.

With no-code interface, users without any coding knowledge can run the application. It comes with a rich set of APIs that helps Automaton to integrate with popular CI tools like Jenkins.

Available as a SaaS offering, for On-Premise deployments and in a hybrid model.

Key Features

1. Data-Driven Testing
Upload bulk credentials through a single CSV file.

2. Regression Testing
Take a big leap from execution planning to the creation of regression plans.

3. Reusability
Access reusable test steps while executing the new test case.

4. Collaboration
Test cases and steps can be duplicated and shared with other users within the group.

5. No-Code Testing
Codeless testing automation is powered by flowchart-based UI.

6. UX & Usability
Configurable GUI and CLI enable users to handle most complex test cases easily.

7. Easy to Use
Intuitive UI and support documentation help the users to understand the tool quickly.

    OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.

    Sample Customers
    Schneider Electric, Orange, O2, IBM, JPMorgan Chase
    Migros Bank AG
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Automaton is ranked 40th in Functional Testing Tools while OpenText Business Processing Testing is ranked 37th in Functional Testing Tools. Automaton is rated 0.0, while OpenText Business Processing Testing is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Business Processing Testing writes "Excellent usability, but the solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with their ALM tool". Automaton is most compared with Appvance IQ, whereas OpenText Business Processing Testing is most compared with .

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.