• Home
  • Automaton vs. OpenText UFT One

Automaton vs OpenText UFT One comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Torry Harris Integration Solutions Logo
Automaton
138 views|104 comparisons
OpenText Logo
OpenText UFT One
Read 89 OpenText UFT One reviews
8,309 views|5,142 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Regression Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automaton and OpenText UFT One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Regression Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Regression Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Automaton?
Anonymous User
Outstanding UFT solution, but there are issues with the scripting
Micro Focus UFT One is useful. However, there is an issue with the scripts. We are going to collaborate with multiple automatic specialists to... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It took about five years to break even. UFT is costly."
  • "The licensing and pricing model is confusing."
  • "It's an expensive solution."
  • "For the price of five automation licenses, you simply would not be able to hire five manual testers for two years worth of 24/7 manual testing work on demand."
  • "The price is only $3,000. I don't know how many QA analysts you would have in any given company. Probably no more than five or 10. So if it's a large corporation, it can easily afford $15,000 to $25,000. I don't see that being an issue."
  • "The way the pricing model works is that you pay a whole boatload year one. Then, every year after, it is around half or less. Because instead of paying for the new product, you are just paying for the support and maintenance of it. That is probably one of the biggest things that I hear from most people, even at conferences, "Yeah, I would love to use UFT One, but we don't have a budget for it.""
  • "The pricing fee is good. If someone makes use of the solution once a day for a half hour then the fee will be more expensive. For continuous use and application of the solution to different use cases, the fee is average."
  • "The price is one aspect that could be improved."

    • More OpenText UFT One Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Regression Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?
    Top Answer:We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well… more »
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?
    Top Answer:My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.
    Read all 35 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?
    Top Answer:The product wasn't easy for developers to learn and pick up in the area revolving around scripting for automation, and there was a lot of resistance from developers, causing my company to rely on… more »
    Read all 34 answers   →
    Ranking
    19th
    out of 30 in Regression Testing Tools
    Views
    138
    Comparisons
    104
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    2nd
    out of 30 in Regression Testing Tools
    Views
    8,309
    Comparisons
    5,142
    Reviews
    20
    Average Words per Review
    694
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus UFT One, UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
    Learn More
    Torry Harris Integration Solutions
    Video Not Available
    OpenText
    Overview

    An illustrative test automation tool with a code-less approach towards end-to-end application testing. Visual flow-based approaches for test cases makes it tester-friendly.

    Automaton is a test automation tool. Automaton uses a visual flowchart-based design interface. It enables end to end continuous test automation of all components in application development - Web, APIs, Logs and Database Processes/Operations.

    With no-code interface, users without any coding knowledge can run the application. It comes with a rich set of APIs that helps Automaton to integrate with popular CI tools like Jenkins.

    Available as a SaaS offering, for On-Premise deployments and in a hybrid model.

    Key Features

    1. Data-Driven Testing
    Upload bulk credentials through a single CSV file.

    2. Regression Testing
    Take a big leap from execution planning to the creation of regression plans.

    3. Reusability
    Access reusable test steps while executing the new test case.

    4. Collaboration
    Test cases and steps can be duplicated and shared with other users within the group.

    5. No-Code Testing
    Codeless testing automation is powered by flowchart-based UI.

    6. UX & Usability
    Configurable GUI and CLI enable users to handle most complex test cases easily.

    7. Easy to Use
    Intuitive UI and support documentation help the users to understand the tool quickly.

      Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications. Read white paper
      Sample Customers
      Schneider Electric, Orange, O2, IBM, JPMorgan Chase
      Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services
      Top Industries
      No Data Available
      REVIEWERS
      Financial Services Firm32%
      Computer Software Company16%
      Insurance Company10%
      Healthcare Company10%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Financial Services Firm19%
      Computer Software Company15%
      Manufacturing Company12%
      Government6%
      Company Size
      No Data Available
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business16%
      Midsize Enterprise14%
      Large Enterprise70%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business15%
      Midsize Enterprise10%
      Large Enterprise75%
      Buyer's Guide
      Regression Testing Tools
      April 2024
      Download Free Report
      Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Regression Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
      DOWNLOAD NOW
      769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

      Automaton is ranked 19th in Regression Testing Tools while OpenText UFT One is ranked 2nd in Regression Testing Tools with 89 reviews. Automaton is rated 0.0, while OpenText UFT One is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText UFT One writes "With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". Automaton is most compared with Appvance IQ, whereas OpenText UFT One is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT Developer, Katalon Studio, SmartBear TestComplete and UiPath Test Suite.

      See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors and best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

      We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.