Compare Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z vs. Micro Focus Hybrid Cloud Management X

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
30th
out of 31 in Release Automation
Views
16
Comparisons
11
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
21st
out of 31 in Release Automation
Views
217
Comparisons
151
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Red Hat, GitLab and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2021.
475,291 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Micro Focus HCM, Micro Focus Hybrid Cloud Management, Codar
Learn More
Overview

Modernize your legacy systems.
We live in the online world. The way of business and technology seems to be all mobile and cloud these days. Nevertheless, mainframes remain paramount and integral to core business transactions worldwide and are here to stay.

At CA Technologies we feel that continuous delivery for the mainframe holds the key to digital transformation with minimal disruption. The mainframe needs to be connected to your continuous delivery pipelines and DevOps practices in order to be completely agile and responsive to business demands.

At present most mainframe users face significant challenges that hinder agility:

Driven by manual interactions–ISPF panels initiate CLIST scripts
Collaboration of multiple Dev and Ops teams involving lots of processes and procedures
Applications written many years ago in COBOL and other legacy languages
Treating the mix of mainframe and distributed apps found in most services differently with dedicated change processes and toolsets
Mitigating risk and ensure compliance in a highly regulated environment
Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z connects digital and mainframe applications, automates them and incorporates them in an automated workflow.

Micro Focus® Hybrid Cloud Management (HCM) is a unified automation framework which allows IT to aggregate cloud services; design, deploy, manage and govern hybrid resources, orchestrate IT processes and provide cloud and cost governance.

Offer
Learn more about Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z
Learn more about Micro Focus Hybrid Cloud Management X
Sample Customers
eviivo
Istanbul Grand Airport
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Red Hat, GitLab and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2021.
475,291 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is ranked 30th in Release Automation while Micro Focus Hybrid Cloud Management X is ranked 21st in Release Automation. Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is rated 0.0, while Micro Focus Hybrid Cloud Management X is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is most compared with , whereas Micro Focus Hybrid Cloud Management X is most compared with Morpheus.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.