Compare Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z vs. Micro Focus Release Control

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
30th
out of 31 in Release Automation
Views
16
Comparisons
11
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
27th
out of 31 in Release Automation
Views
60
Comparisons
18
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Red Hat, GitLab and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2021.
475,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Modernize your legacy systems.
We live in the online world. The way of business and technology seems to be all mobile and cloud these days. Nevertheless, mainframes remain paramount and integral to core business transactions worldwide and are here to stay.

At CA Technologies we feel that continuous delivery for the mainframe holds the key to digital transformation with minimal disruption. The mainframe needs to be connected to your continuous delivery pipelines and DevOps practices in order to be completely agile and responsive to business demands.

At present most mainframe users face significant challenges that hinder agility:

Driven by manual interactions–ISPF panels initiate CLIST scripts
Collaboration of multiple Dev and Ops teams involving lots of processes and procedures
Applications written many years ago in COBOL and other legacy languages
Treating the mix of mainframe and distributed apps found in most services differently with dedicated change processes and toolsets
Mitigating risk and ensure compliance in a highly regulated environment
Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z connects digital and mainframe applications, automates them and incorporates them in an automated workflow.

Micro Focus Release Control helps enterprises orchestrate application release with a flexible process-centric approach, giving visibility and efficiency across the deployment pipeline. This platform allows customers to unify and automate processes, increase collaboration manage release process, planning, scheduling, reporting, and approvals. Notification and reporting to all release stakeholders occur automatically, ensuring that the status of releases are communicated accurately and promptly and that there are no surprises regarding release schedules. Additionally, handoffs between development, QA, and IT Operations are streamlined and accelerated. More information here.

Offer
Learn more about Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z
Learn more about Micro Focus Release Control
Sample Customers
eviivo
GuideStone, TIAA CREF, EatonVance, D&B, Citi, Department of Health and Human Services USA, UBS, DTCC, Bp, Aflac, Ameritrade, Groupama, Credit Agricole, Lombard Odier, Telecom Italia, GreatAmerican, MUFG
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Red Hat, GitLab and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2021.
475,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is ranked 30th in Release Automation while Micro Focus Release Control is ranked 27th in Release Automation. Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is rated 0.0, while Micro Focus Release Control is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is most compared with , whereas Micro Focus Release Control is most compared with .

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.