• Home
  • Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z vs. OpenText Release Control

Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z vs OpenText Release Control comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z and OpenText Release Control based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
32nd
out of 32 in Release Automation
Views
22
Comparisons
12
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
26th
out of 32 in Release Automation
Views
73
Comparisons
28
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Micro Focus Release Control
Learn More
Broadcom
Video Not Available
OpenText
Overview

Modernize your legacy systems.
We live in the online world. The way of business and technology seems to be all mobile and cloud these days. Nevertheless, mainframes remain paramount and integral to core business transactions worldwide and are here to stay.

At CA Technologies we feel that continuous delivery for the mainframe holds the key to digital transformation with minimal disruption. The mainframe needs to be connected to your continuous delivery pipelines and DevOps practices in order to be completely agile and responsive to business demands.

At present most mainframe users face significant challenges that hinder agility:

Driven by manual interactions–ISPF panels initiate CLIST scripts
Collaboration of multiple Dev and Ops teams involving lots of processes and procedures
Applications written many years ago in COBOL and other legacy languages
Treating the mix of mainframe and distributed apps found in most services differently with dedicated change processes and toolsets
Mitigating risk and ensure compliance in a highly regulated environment
Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z connects digital and mainframe applications, automates them and incorporates them in an automated workflow.

Plan, track, orchestrate, and release complex applications across any environment. OpenText Release Control enables you to orchestrate application releases with a flexible, process-centric approach.
Sample Customers
eviivo
GuideStone, TIAA CREF, EatonVance, D&B, Citi, Department of Health and Human Services USA, UBS, DTCC, Bp, Aflac, Ameritrade, Groupama, Credit Agricole, Lombard Odier, Telecom Italia, GreatAmerican, MUFG
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is ranked 32nd in Release Automation while OpenText Release Control is ranked 26th in Release Automation. Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is rated 0.0, while OpenText Release Control is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is most compared with , whereas OpenText Release Control is most compared with .

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.