We performed a comparison between AutoSys Workload Automation and CA Workload Automation iDash [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation."It is very valuable for us when we are trying to arrange or orchestrate jobs into a system. It is helpful for triggering jobs for a scheduled task."
"Automation of patch process."
"AutoSys Workload Automation is a stable solution."
"This solution enables us to improve our daily processing times. We can do everything faster than before we used this solution."
"It gives us flexibility when doing releases. We can make changes for one day in a PDS member, since we stage our jobs by date, and the next day the normal job definitions are run."
"The customized views that each individual can create, and views that can be made free-form, makes this very popular with the programmers."
"It has improved my organization by automating IT applications."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the functions are easy to use."
"The stability of the solution is good. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches and we haven't had any crashes that I can recall."
"The solution is easy to manipulate and has good performance."
"Performance improvements in the UI would be appreciated."
"The solution could improve by having support for container environments."
"SQL server clustering is not supported."
"More benefits with the agent upgrades, and that's about it. Other than that we have no complaints with it. It's been awesome."
"AutoSys Workload Automation could improve in the Linux environment. The previous versions of the AutoSys Workload Automation let you take the profile of the user that you were using to run the tasks that you're going to automate, but in the latest versions, you can't do that, you need to make more definitions and it's a little bit difficult. It was easier in the previous versions."
"The solution does not have a friendly subscription model because it forces users to take a five-year subscription simultaneously, charging millions of dollars."
"I would like to see the Service Orchestrator, a B2B product, and maybe a process audit."
"CA Workload Automation is not part of CA's strategic vision going forward."
"The technical support could be improved by removing delays in response times. They should be able to get back to clients faster."
"We have difficulties manipulating the agent for Windows."
Earn 20 points
AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews while CA Workload Automation iDash [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Workload Automation. AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4, while CA Workload Automation iDash [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CA Workload Automation iDash [EOL] writes "An easy initial setup with scalability capabilities and good stability". AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Stonebranch and Automic Workload Automation, whereas CA Workload Automation iDash [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.