AutoSys Workload Automation vs CA Workload Automation iDash [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AutoSys Workload Automation and CA Workload Automation iDash [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Workload Automation Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It can run an object on our Windows systems or our Unix systems, and then send messages to the other system when they are complete.""It gives a real-time view of all the batch processing that we have. Monitoring-wise, it is really good.""Automic Automation Engine provides us the ability to map logic using a scripting language.""Without this product we would have to manually submit jobs and it would take longer. There would also be a much greater possibility of jobs running wrong and/or not at the right time.""This solution enables us to improve our daily processing times. We can do everything faster than before we used this solution.""We don't have to manually run things anymore. We can have the work that a team of 50 people would do, all inside of one platform.""The initial setup is easy.""It is a fairly stable solution."

More AutoSys Workload Automation Pros →

"The solution is easy to manipulate and has good performance.""The stability of the solution is good. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches and we haven't had any crashes that I can recall."

More CA Workload Automation iDash [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"I am looking forward to more of their dashboard features. I think it would be very valuable for us to have dashboard features that could be delivered to our customers in the form of a URL, and they could refresh that URL whenever they wanted to get up to date performance metrics out of our systems.""Ease of implementation for upgrades.""The solution does not have a friendly subscription model because it forces users to take a five-year subscription simultaneously, charging millions of dollars.""I am not sure whether it is our limitation or a tool limitation because we haven't yet explored it, but whenever we look for different types of reporting, we have some limitations in getting those. It could be because of the way we have set it up internally in our enterprise, but it would be helpful if we can customize the reporting features and some of the alerts that can go out. When we connect enterprise systems, each one looks for a different use case, and if we can get different types of reporting, it will be helpful.""The GUI/Workstation is weak and needs to be improved. CA is working on this right now.""I would like to see two-factor authentication, since you see a lot of companies in the news for security breaches. That is a really big thing for us.""​CA installation processes are never anything but complex.​""To make it a lot more user-friendly, in order to make it so other people can use it without having to do much training with it; the more user-friendly it is, the easier it is to work with."

More AutoSys Workload Automation Cons →

"The technical support could be improved by removing delays in response times. They should be able to get back to clients faster.""We have difficulties manipulating the agent for Windows."

More CA Workload Automation iDash [EOL] Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Validate how many agents you need beforehand."
  • "CA pricing has been a problem, and not looked upon favorably here at all."
  • "People need to pay attention to how they use their ESP agents on the distributed platform. That's where some of the cost comes in, based on how many you need or how many you use."
  • "I certainly think the pricing is worth the value."
  • "It is overpriced."
  • "The pricing needs to be improved. Some of my client's complained that it was too expensive."
  • "The price of this solution is reasonable and there is an annual license required."
  • "There is an annual license to use AutoSys Workload Automation."
  • More AutoSys Workload Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable aspects of AutoSys Workload Automation are its performance, scalability, and ease of getting started for new users.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    6th
    out of 51 in Workload Automation
    Views
    9,505
    Comparisons
    7,115
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    468
    Rating
    8.1
    Unranked
    In Workload Automation
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA Workload Automation, CA Workload Automation AE
    Learn More
    Overview

    AutoSys Workload Automation delivers end-to-end visibility of application workloads and dependencies across platforms, ERP systems, and the cloud. Thanks to event-based triggering, real-time alerting, and dynamic critical path management, business applications are ensured for availability.

    By intelligently and effectively assigning workloads based on real-time information about the available computing resources and service level agreements, AutoSys Workload Automation scales to enterprise demands with ease. The solution permits businesses to swiftly provision and handle workloads in physical, virtualized, and cloud environments.

    The platform helps to reduce the cost and complexity of managing mission-critical business processes, ensuring consistent and reliable service delivery. AutoSys Workload Automation is a job control solution that allows you to manage workloads via a command-line interface (CLI) or graphical user interface (GUI).

    AutoSys Workload Automation Features

    AutoSys Workload Automation has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Multi-platform scheduling: Manage and visualize a process end to end across multiple platforms from a central point of control.
    • Extensive scalability: Provide production scalability without the need for multiple server instances.
    • Extensive app support: Manage workloads for business apps such as PeopleSoft, SAP, and Oracle E-Business. This results in lower operating costs and increased cross-enterprise visibility.
    • Built-in fault tolerance: Robust, lights-out operations with automated recovery that facilitates the availability of business systems by enabling jobs to be completed accurately and on time.
    • Self service: End-users have the ability to request and execute workload processing that is controlled by workload policy and governance processes. This gives businesses more control over their own services.
    • Security and compliance: Better meet regulatory compliance requirements by defining access permissions at any level. If there are problems, you can view what was changed, by whom, and at what time.

    AutoSys Workload Automation Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing AutoSys Workload Automation. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • Job scheduling, monitoring, and reporting: Jobs can be scheduled across platforms. When a job enters different production schedule phases, keep track of it and give reports.
    • Create reports that ease regulatory compliance and improve control.
    • Forecasting is used to detect and comprehend the business impact of work within a job stream. You can send notifications for overdue tasks or bypass less critical jobs.
    • Managing resources: The solution assesses the resources that are available and schedules jobs to achieve a defined SLA, enhancing resource utilization.

    Reviews from Real Users

    AutoSys Workload Automation stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its file transfer protocol and its visibility for batch processing. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:

    One PeerSpot reviewer, an IT consultant at a computer software company, writes, “The most valuable features of AutoSys Workload Automation are the file transfer protocol and file watcher. The solution has a user-friendly user interface. It is very simple to use. You have a scope of all your jobs, jobs are what you call tasks that you will automate in the solution. It lets you monitor everything in these jobs.

    Another PeerSpot reviewer, a head at an insurance company, notes, “It gives a real-time view of all the batch processing that we have. Monitoring-wise, it is really good. It also gives us the ability to connect different software processes.”

    CA Workload Automation iDash (iDash) ensures that you consistently deliver on service level guarantees by applying advanced workload analytics to create finely tuned workload automation environments. iDash performs real-time forecasts based on the current status of the system, generate alerts when thresholds are at risk of being missed, and even executes automated recovery actions for CA Workload Automation AE and CA Workload Automation CA 7 Edition environments.

    Sample Customers
    Gaumont, Mercantil do Brasil, CCEE, Hanwha Life
    COTA
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm46%
    Insurance Company14%
    Energy/Utilities Company11%
    Healthcare Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm46%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Computer Software Company6%
    Insurance Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm43%
    Insurance Company8%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Wholesaler/Distributor8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise82%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business9%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise85%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business7%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise81%
    Buyer's Guide
    Workload Automation
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation. Updated: March 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews while CA Workload Automation iDash [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Workload Automation. AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4, while CA Workload Automation iDash [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CA Workload Automation iDash [EOL] writes "An easy initial setup with scalability capabilities and good stability". AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Stonebranch and Automic Workload Automation, whereas CA Workload Automation iDash [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.