We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Stonebranch Universal Automation Center

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Stonebranch Universal Automation Center and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
552,407 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It allows us to organize everything into a process flow throughout the day for our different tasks that we have to run. So, it keeps everything organized. It is easy to monitor and adjust, if we need to.""The most valuable feature is the self-service because it has made it possible to provide simple and quick solutions in the handling of certain tasks.""Since we got it configured, it has just done the job day in, day out. Being able to rely on it and know that it's going to happen, whether there's a person over it or not, is really good.""There are a lot of valuable features. The version that we're currently casting, Self Service, is going to be the most valuable to us. It is going to allow us to open up the doors, broaden our automation capability and help other business units to be able to automate a lot of the little things that they do from day to day. I'm really looking forward to being able to help other areas with their automation needs. Self Service is really key.""OpCon has also reduced our data processing times because of the way you can build out workflows. It can run things in sequence. It's not restricted to a linear process, so you can run multiple jobs at once, allowing for multi-threaded jobs.""When a lot of jobs are scheduled on different platforms, without any interaction possible between them, it's very difficult to manage things. With OpCon we avoid this difficulty. It's very visual.""We're also starting to use its Self Service and Solution Manager. My team in the data center and some of the development team use the Self Service. Developers are using the Self Service for upon-request jobs for their testing. They used to have to go through us to schedule testing and now they can just go on and kick it off all they want. They have also really appreciated that they have access to view and/or submit jobs.""Often times there are criteria that cannot be determined by the system, which allows a human to make the determination and use the Self-Service Solution Manager to trigger a job."

More OpCon Pros »

"Easy configuration and integration with SAP.""The features that I have found most valuable with AutoSys are that it is scalable, easy to use, fast, and always available. That's very important because if it's not steady then it's a real problem. So, at this point, we are satisfied with it.""The most valuable feature of this solution is the functions are easy to use.""AutoSys Workload Automation is a stable solution.""This solution has made my clients' workplaces a lot less labor-intensive."

More AutoSys Workload Automation Pros »

"The interface is very user-friendly and easy to navigate.""The tasks are incredibly capable, and as long as you name them with a nice, uniform naming convention, they are very useful. You can create some interesting workflows through various machines, or you can just have it kick off single tasks. All in all, I really like the Universal Task. You can do some mutually exclusive stuff, such as an "A not B" kind of thing. It has a lot of capabilities behind the scenes.""I like the dashboard and the various workflows."

More Stonebranch Universal Automation Center Pros »

Cons
"There are some limitations in the actual jobs that are created and how you're able to rename files. Suppose you're bringing in, say, 10, 15, or 20 reports from a core system, and you're using an "asterisk character" to identify files. For example, if you're grabbing files that start with this, end with this, but the characters in between could be different, it has to retain that same name in the destination. It won't allow you to rename them with a date stamp or the like.""Licensing would be the first part I would overhaul. Each time a new licensing paradigm comes out, more features are removed and costs are added. They "add" features that are rarely used and increase charges for the number of jobs run. I'm sure someone in finance got a raise for their brilliance but the end-users won't thank them one bit. Expect price hikes and threats when you hold them to account at every opportunity.""What can get complicated is if you're doing anything more than just the built-in jobs. If you're using the more advanced features, troubleshooting becomes extremely complicated.""The calendar interface and the frequency interface is a very powerful, yet complex, section of OpCon in which all our staff have made mistakes. They have implemented what they believed was logically correct and then afterward discovered that their logic was flawed because OpCon did it a different way. That part, which is incredibly useful, is also incredibly dangerous. The interface or the ability to directly do more functions within the frequency definitely has room for expansion. As good as it is, it can be a lot better.""Usage is a little complex. It's not like you can bring somebody in and they can just use it. They have to be trained... As far as complexity goes, it's right up there.""There is a learning curve. We had to go to class, learn, and take their training classes, then come back. We got assistance from OpCon as well to convert our processes on the Unisys machine over to the IBM. Now, when we add new products, it's pretty straightforward to write a new process and schedule it, then run it at a set time of day.""It would be great if you could create physically separate "clients," as I call them. I wish I could have a production client and a testing client and that they would be separate.""The SQL database connections are the only time that we've had issues with reliability and stability of the software."

More OpCon Cons »

"Quick search feature and job analysis could be improved.""In terms of what should be in the next release, I want integration and AI and so on. I'd like easy reporting where you can compare information, for example, "that job normally takes three minutes and last time it took six minutes or 10 minutes." Then you can get the information to the engineer of which job is taking more time than normal - understanding strange behavior compared to the baseline.""The graphical interface can be improved.""The solution could improve by having support for container environments."

More AutoSys Workload Automation Cons »

"There is room for improvement with its connectivity with the Microsoft SRS system. It is very weak. They keep telling us it works with it, and technically it does, but it does not provide a lot of visibility. We have lost a lot of visibility migrating to Stonebranch, compared with just running tasks on the SRS server. That's really about the only thing that is a sore point for us.""It can't handle negative written codes.""It would be ideal if they had the exact same features as the CA Workload Automation DE series. It would be helpful to have calendaring options."

More Stonebranch Universal Automation Center Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"There are different add-ons, like the Self Service or Vision model. It all depends on what agents you have in your environment. We have a mainframe and Windows, and while I think SQL is free, SAP or anything beyond that has different connectors that might need a license.""The pricing is very reasonable.""Yearly, it's around $30,000.""Yearly, we're paying about $62,000. OpCon has an all-inclusive feature and module license, but you pay per task.""It's definitely worth the cost.""Annually, we pay $29,000. This is for a blanket policy that covers everything, like licensing and support.""On a yearly basis our cost is between $25,000 and $30,000.""I believe our cost is about $150,000 annually."

More OpCon Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The price of this solution is reasonable and there is an annual license required.""The pricing needs to be improved. Some of my client's complained that it was too expensive."

More AutoSys Workload Automation Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
552,407 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Often times there are criteria that cannot be determined by the system, which allows a human to make the determination… more »
Top Answer: This tool, like any other quality product, fits the idea of "You get what you pay for." The SMA Technologies consultants… more »
Top Answer: The products are extremely powerful and capable. Anytime you have such capability, the programming/configuration that… more »
Top Answer: Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful… more »
Top Answer: AutoSys Workload Automation is a stable solution.
Top Answer: The graphical interface can be improved.
Top Answer: I like the dashboard and the various workflows.
Top Answer: It can't handle negative written codes. If a program was providing a negative value, it wouldn't be able to handle it… more »
Comparisons
Also Known As
CA Workload Automation, CA Workload Automation AE
Learn More
Overview

OpCon is a robust and flexible platform capable of scaling up to meet the needs of clients running 140,000+ daily jobs across multiple environments and operating systems. Our proven migration framework helps clients painlessly transition from outdated or cost inefficient platforms thanks to our deep organizational expertise, REST API, and extensive library of legacy connectors. We have a variety of consulting options available for clients and offer no-cost training for the life of the contract.

CA Workload Automation is an enterprise scheduling solution for the automation of IT processes in a heterogeneous environment. It automates and delivers millions of mission-essential services across thousands of companies worldwide. With the CA team and expert community, you get so much more than software. Work with us to get to mission-accomplished—every second of your business.

The Stonebranch Workload Automation solution, part of our Universal Automation Center platform, helps organizations automate, manage, and orchestrate their IT processes - across hybrid IT environments. 


1. Workflow Orchestration and Automation: Holistically control scripts, jobs, tasks, and IT processes running across your on-prem, hybrid cloud, and/or multi-cloud environments.

2. Real-Time Automation: With our event-driven automation technology, it is now possible to achieve real-time automation across your entire hybrid IT environment.

3. Self-Service Automation: With a focus on ease-of-use, you can empower your workforce with self-service automation using member roles and permissions.

4. BI & Analytics: Centralize operational control and insight with proactive monitoring, reporting, and alerts

Product Features:

- Drag-and-drop Workflow Creation: You don’t have to be a developer to create automation. Custom scripting is a thing of the past. Easily create workflows with an intuitive drag-and-drop user interface.

- DevOps enabled: Align priorities between IT Ops and DevOps with Jobs-as-Code, Infrastructure-as-Code, and bundle-and-promote features.

- Limitless 3rd Party Integrations: Integrate into any platform or application from the mainframe to the cloud. Use pre-packaged integrations, build your own, or download integration blueprints from the community-driven opensource marketplace.

- Available on-premises or as a SaaS-based deployment, the UAC is a modern platform built to scale with your business.

Offer
Accel­er­ate dig­i­tal trans­for­ma­tion through work­load automation

Automate repetitive tasks so you can focus on projects that drive your business forward. Find out how OpCon workload automation enables you to create repeatable, reliable workflows - all managed from a single platform.

Learn more about AutoSys Workload Automation
Learn more about Stonebranch Universal Automation Center
Sample Customers
LOHR, Carnival Cruise Lines, Herbalife, Digital Federal Credit Union, Synergent, Frandsen Bank & Trust
Gaumont, Mercantil do Brasil, CCEE, Hanwha Life
Nissan, Coop, United Supermarkets, Groupon, CSC, Orbitz, Johnson & Johnson, BMW, Qantas.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm78%
Insurance Company8%
Government4%
Manufacturing Company2%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Financial Services Firm18%
Insurance Company10%
Comms Service Provider9%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm47%
Insurance Company14%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
Healthcare Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Financial Services Firm23%
Comms Service Provider8%
Manufacturing Company8%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm47%
Insurance Company16%
Retailer11%
Transportation Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Financial Services Firm18%
Comms Service Provider10%
Insurance Company10%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise43%
Large Enterprise32%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business56%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise23%
REVIEWERS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise84%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise61%
REVIEWERS
Small Business5%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise75%
Find out what your peers are saying about AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Stonebranch Universal Automation Center and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
552,407 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 7th in Workload Automation with 6 reviews while Stonebranch Universal Automation Center is ranked 8th in Workload Automation with 4 reviews. AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 6.6, while Stonebranch Universal Automation Center is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Scalable, fast, easy to use and always available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Stonebranch Universal Automation Center writes "Allows us to streamline the workflow so that the machines aren't sitting idle, and production is much quicker". AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, Automic Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, IBM Workload Automation and Redwood Business Process Automation - Workload Edition, whereas Stonebranch Universal Automation Center is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, ActiveBatch Workload Automation, CA Workload Automation ESP and Automic Workload Automation. See our AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Stonebranch Universal Automation Center report.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.