We performed a comparison between Avalor and Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management.More Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Avalor is ranked 17th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management while Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is ranked 11th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 1 review. Avalor is rated 0.0, while Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) writes "Offers contextual prioritization and risk-based remediation of vulnerability". Avalor is most compared with Brinqa, Vulcan Cyber, Tenable Vulnerability Management, Tenable Security Center and Nucleus, whereas Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is most compared with Rapid7 InsightVM, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Ivanti Neurons for RBVM and Brinqa.
See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.