Avalor vs Tenable Security Center comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Avalor Security Logo
190 views|130 comparisons
Tenable Logo
13,635 views|10,384 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Avalor and Tenable Security Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Jahanzeb Feroze Khan
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It is slightly more expensive than other solutions in the same sphere."
  • "We're able to save because we don't have to employ more staff members to help wit ht he scheduling of the scans, running the reports or sending them out to the systems owners. That alone is a big ROI for us."
  • "The licensing costs for this solution are approximately $100,000 US, and I think that covers everything."
  • "The pricing is more than Nexpose."
  • "Costing is pretty reasonable compared to the competition."
  • "We're a Fortune 500 company... our licensing costs [are] in the seven figures."
  • "We pay around 60,000 on a yearly basis."
  • "The price can start at €10,000 ($13,000 USD) for between 500 and 1,000 assets, and the price can climb into the millions as more assets are added."
  • More Tenable Security Center Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The tool's dashboard and reporting capabilities match our company's needs since we are able to modify the basic view to create a new dashboard, and it works out very well for our needs.
    Top Answer:I rate the solution's price as seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The tool is quite expensive.
    Top Answer:The tool's initial configuration is not so easy. The hardware requirements related to the tool need to be better because we need a lot of memory to achieve speed in the solution. If our company needs… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    190
    Comparisons
    130
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    13,635
    Comparisons
    10,384
    Reviews
    26
    Average Words per Review
    423
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Tenable.sc, Tenable Unified Security, Tenable SecurityCenter
    Learn More
    Avalor Security
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Our data fabric architecture integrates disparate data sources from legacy systems, data lakes, data warehouses, sql databases, and apps, providing a holistic view of business performance.
    Automation, 2-way sync, alerts, and analytics live on top of the platform, powered by the data fabric.
    All security functions benefit from fast, reliable, and precise analysis of enterprise data including asset coverage, compliance reporting, ROSI analysis, vulnerability management, and more.

    Get a risk-based view of your IT, security and compliance posture so you can quickly identify, investigate and prioritize your most critical assets and vulnerabilities.

    Managed on-premises and powered by Nessus technology, the Tenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) suite of products provides the industry’s most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your network. It’s your complete end-to-end vulnerability management solution.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    IBM, Sempra Energy, Microsoft, Apple, Adidas, Union Pacific
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm31%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Computer Software Company12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization16%
    Government12%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise54%
    Buyer's Guide
    Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: April 2024.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Avalor is ranked 17th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management while Tenable Security Center is ranked 1st in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 48 reviews. Avalor is rated 0.0, while Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". Avalor is most compared with Brinqa, Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), Vulcan Cyber, Tenable Vulnerability Management and Nucleus, whereas Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM and Horizon3.ai.

    See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.

    We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.