We performed a comparison between AWS Application Migration Service and VMware SRM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Zerto, IBM and others in Cloud Migration."The CloudEndure feature is most valuable because it is user friendly and very simple."
"Live Migration's best feature is that it's free."
"The most valuable feature is the live, block-to-block replication."
"The product is reasonably priced."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...I rate the solution's support a ten out of ten."
"It is a stable solution...The solution's technical support is excellent."
"My impression is that the initial setup process is relatively straightforward."
"Combined with RecoverPoint, it offers zero RPO and zero RTO."
"I like how VMware SRM is able to automate and orchestrate disaster recovery."
"The most valuable feature is the simplicity of operations."
"Its capability to schedule, write and configure the recovery and scheduled steps, such that you don't have to come in and start manually trying to recover the entire machine. You just push a button to recover the VMware and everything is done."
"The most valuable features are the disaster recovery and testing."
"VMware SRM is a very nice tool for disaster recovery for virtual environments."
"Live Migration has some issues with target setups."
"One drawback to using CloudEndure is that the default is to give one small, lightweight server, which is created in the cloud."
"I do not see any improvements required for the CloudEndure."
"We would like to have a disaster recovery feature included in this solution."
"I think it is important to have more logs, and more details would be great because we have just logged on the client's side, but there weren't many details on the cloud."
"The user experience could be more friendly."
"It would be better if we could get more reporting features in VMware SRM."
"Technical support needs improvement, they are not very responsive."
"The solution is on the expensive side."
"Sometimes it can cause a bit of downtime during switchovers."
"The product's dashboard is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"There is room for improvement in the automation and orchestration aspects of this solution."
"Technical support can take some time to respond."
More AWS Application Migration Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS Application Migration Service is ranked 8th in Cloud Migration with 5 reviews while VMware SRM is ranked 6th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 71 reviews. AWS Application Migration Service is rated 8.2, while VMware SRM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS Application Migration Service writes "Well priced, easy to expand, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware SRM writes "A scalable solution that integrates well with the VMware platform, but its platform agnostics do not support on-cloud usage". AWS Application Migration Service is most compared with Zerto and Carbonite Migrate, whereas VMware SRM is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Zerto, Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines, Azure Site Recovery and VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery.
We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.