Axis Security vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Lookout Logo
259 views|197 comparisons
71% willing to recommend
HPE Aruba Networking Logo
1,524 views|952 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Zscaler Logo
10,795 views|8,553 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Axis Security and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zscaler, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in ZTNA as a Service.
To learn more, read our detailed ZTNA as a Service Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is stable.""The protection offered by the product is the most valuable feature. It detects vulnerabilities or traps on our users' phones and then prompts them to clean up their devices. Tools we used previously would only discover, which required us to gather information on the backend, so Lookout is a welcome upgrade.""The most valuable features are the antivirus as a whole, the anti-malware, and all of the protection features that scan our enterprise devices.""On the outside, the main differentiation is because Lookout ingest. They have ingested basically all of the apps for the last ten years and all the versions of all the apps, and we have that in a corporate database that allows us to do very large-scale machine learning and analysis on that data set. That's not something that any of the competitors really have the capability to do because they don't have access to the data set. A lot of the apps you can no longer get them because that version of the app is five or six years old, and it just doesn't exist anywhere anymore, except within our infrastructure. So, the ability to have that very rich dataset and learn from that dataset is a real differentiator."

More Lookout Pros →

"I would give it an A-plus for securing access to our applications, devices, and network. It does an extremely good job. Our security folks have analyzed it and tried to find loopholes, but they found none.""The entire suite and the entire ZTNA process are very valuable.""The way the access connectors work is valuable.""The most valuable part so far has been Axis Security's ability to create identity connections to various servers, allowing users to access them. By doing so, we've managed to replace any old or existing VPN access with Axis Security. We are slowly but surely getting rid of our traditional VPN.""The most valuable aspect is its ability to restrict unauthorized access, ensuring that only approved devices can connect to the network. T"

More Axis Security Pros →

"The solution offers a simplified network infrastructure and security functions and it enables secure remote access for the users""The VPN is great for the stability on offer and for the cloud updates and insights you can get.""The most valuable features of this solution are the CASB solutions, which is protecting their Office 365.""The most valuable feature is the manageability of the micro tunnels.""It is straightforward to set up.""What I find most valuable in Zscaler Private Access is that it's a VPN. Its connectivity as a VPN is its most valuable feature.""Users get direct secure access to applications over the internet.""The user interface of Zscaler Private Access is excellent. With proper knowledge and expertise, one can efficiently handle intricate enterprise environments without feeling overwhelmed. This leads to exceptional productivity for managed service providers. The user experience is remarkably streamlined, enabling the management of even the most complex enterprise setups without any excessive complications."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Pros →

Cons
"The stability depends on the service from where you access it. Because sometimes, the place you are in, you have Gateway. You don't have Gateway. The gateway is overutilized. At the end, you need to go through their gateways. And this is the key point here. You have a tracking point. If it's not well orchestrated, and it scales up as you add more to the existing team, you will suffer""Lookout was moving into the SSE space. And so their work on SecureWeb Gateway and SD-WAN is still sort of evolving.""We just submitted an enhancement request reflecting the main area we want to see improvement in; the APIs. Currently, we're able to build dashboards, but it's somewhat backward because we use our MDM API to create them. Lookout should provide API to customers so we can query our data and use it in our cloud, and this is the only outstanding area for improvement with the product right now.""From the analysis that we've done, they do seem to be maybe a step behind in trying to enter the market with a new solution. But when they do pick up, they do come out with some good products."

More Lookout Cons →

"I would like more detailed logging in the Axis Security interface.""The support team should be more skilled in offering assistance.""They need to improve the networking and security tools a little in the troubleshooting and 'bad-actor' areas to help us analyze security threats a little better. They have some things built-in, but I would like to see more advanced tools.""I would like more statistics about what's going on in terms of usage. There is little-to-no usage reporting. That's one thing we've requested, and I think they're working on it.""I would appreciate more automated learning capabilities or increased integration with other security tools, allowing us to establish automation."

More Axis Security Cons →

"I can't speak to any missing features.""The menu for the ZIA portal could be organized a little bit differently. The most-used modules should be at the top of the menus, not somewhere near the bottom, some of them are not organized well in my opinion.""The pricing for Private Access seems to be on the expensive side, and I believe they should consider making it more competitive with other solutions.""Users report application access or latency issues with Zscaler Private Access.""It has a limitation, if you are creating a rule or something for a web application or something, you could only add five users, not more than that. Five or four users are only included in a rule. If you want to create a rule for more than five or four users, you have to go through other methods, not particularly with the application. Working within the application with this method would be quite easy as compared to listing a URL or a normal IP address.""It's an expensive solution.""Zscaler Private Access could improve by improving external access. If external parties want to access locally to my company's services, we need to onboard them into our domain, otherwise, it doesn't work. Additionally, if their company also has Zscaler Private Access, then it doesn't work. They need to log in with our domain ID, not their company ID.""It has massive room for improvement. The Zscaler product itself is okay, but it doesn't give enough granularity for us as an organization to stipulate rules or processes, especially for data-driven services. For instance, we can stick on SSL inspection, but it's just a click box. It doesn't allow us to go any further into the detail of the SSL inspection. We also can't pull it out without having an additional logging server. It just doesn't give us enough granularity. They should give us more control over the interfaces because it is all backend. They weren't very open to discussing their backend architecture with us in terms of their own data centers. They can maybe a little bit more open about what components are there and how the backend infrastructure works alongside Zscaler. Its licensing can be better. Some of the additional licensing costs are quite high, and they should have certain features ready and available as a baseline rather than having to purchase additional licenses for it. Their support should also be improved. I initially had a consultant from Zscaler for its deployment, but the support that I had throughout the deployment of the project wasn't the best."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing is fair; it's comparable to our previous solution, and we carried out multiple POCs and POVs (proof of value). The product is worth the money we pay for it."
  • "Lookout is definitely on the lower end when it comes to price point and that seems to be the only differentiator. The technology is in place in this space and it's really about who is coming in at the better price point now."
  • "In terms of feature performance versus cost, they're a good value."
  • "The licensing costs are good. Prisma has much more options and support for security, but it has a higher cost. For example, Lookout costs 2/3rd of Prisma's licensing price."
  • More Lookout Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is quite fair. It's better than what we gave up, which was Cisco AnyConnect."
  • "The pricing is very competitive from what I've seen."
  • More Axis Security Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It has been relatively reasonable for what it does. Some of the additional license costs based on the advanced next-generation firewall functions are quite high, and they should have certain features ready and available as a baseline rather than having to purchase additional licenses for it. Overall, the cost seems reasonable."
  • "Pricing for Zscaler Private Access is moderate. It's acceptable, though I can't give you the exact price currently. It's not too expensive, and on a scale of one to five, I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."
  • "The pricing is expensive and on the higher end. Honestly, in my opinion, it is not worth the price."
  • "The cost is expensive. It depends on the number of users."
  • "My company is a Zscaler Private Access partner, so the customers pay for the license fees."
  • "The price is competitive."
  • "In terms of market positioning, I would describe Zscaler Private Access as offering optimal pricing. Based on our experience, Cato Networks tends to be slightly more expensive."
  • "Zscaler Private Access is extremely expensive."
  • More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ZTNA as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The licensing costs are good. Prisma has much more options and support for security, but it has a higher cost. For… more »
    Top Answer:The solution could improve identity integration as well. Zero trust, it's a good start as a zero-trust solution… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable aspect is its ability to restrict unauthorized access, ensuring that only approved devices can connect… more »
    Top Answer:The support team should be more skilled in offering assistance.
    Top Answer: We looked into Prisma Access before choosing Zscaler Private Access (ZPA). Palo Alto’s Prisma Access is a secure… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of Zscaler Private Access are reliability, scalability, and availability.
    Top Answer:Zscaler SASE is quite expensive compared to other solutions. The price is not fixed and it does not include all of the… more »
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CipherCloud
    Zscaler SASE
    Learn More
    Overview

    Lookout is a well-established and powerful secure web gateway (SWG) solution that protects more than 200 million users from threats that can result from the penetration of unsecured web traffic into their networks. Lookout is designed to enable organizations to work remotely while maintaining a tight blanket of security over their confidential business data. It provides administrators with security that extends from their endpoints to the cloud service that they are using to run their organization’s network. 

    Users of Lookout are able to proactively detect threats and keep themselves secure from a field of threats that constantly evolves. IT teams can protect their organizations without having to rely on any other security solutions. This singular solution can run on multiple kinds of mobile devices. The privacy of individuals is preserved while keeping compliance rules intact. Additionally, users gain access to a number of tools that enable them to prevent security breaches from taking place.

    Lookout Benefits

    Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by deploying Lookout include:

    • Ease of deployment. Lookout is a solution whose design makes it easy for users to deploy it. It provides users with simple, step-by-step instructions that remove the need for organizations to devote extensive amounts of time to make sure that it is properly set up. Anyone can quickly set up the solution without undergoing technical training. 
    • Built-in support. Users of the Lookout application have access to built-in demos that can teach them how to use various solution features. Instead of spending time trying to figure out the application, users can watch the demo that is most relevant to them and see for themselves how that particular feature is used.
    • Easy-to-use user interface. Lookout’s user interface is laid out in an intuitive way that makes it easy for administrators to navigate. This interface is present in both the mobile and desktop versions of this solution. 
    • Settings customization. Lookout has a built-in settings customization menu. This makes it possible for administrators to easily customize their settings so that they best conform to their needs. 

    Lookout Features

    • Activity monitoring and activity tracking. Lookout’s activity monitoring and activity tracking capabilities enable users to keep a close eye on the activities that are taking place in their networks. IT teams and administrators have the ability to watch their networks for any unusual activity. These features ensure that organizations can keep ahead of any potential threats. They provide the kinds of insights and warnings that make the jobs of those IT teams and administrators much easier and more streamlined. 
    • Encryption. Organizations that employ Lookout can encrypt their networks and keep crucial business data from being read by unauthorized parties. This feature keeps the secrets organizations are trying to keep out of the wrong hands.
    • Anti-virus tools. Lookout provides users with tools to block threats from harming their networks. These tools can successfully block 99.6 percent of threats without raising false alarms. 

    Axis Security is a prominent enterprise security solution, specializing in Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA). The Axis Security Application Access Cloud platform is designed to secure remote access to applications and services hosted in the cloud or on-premises. It aims to simplify and enhance access controls while maintaining strong security measures.

    Axis Security's platform stands out by offering a comprehensive, cloud-native solution designed to enable secure access to private applications. Their Application Access Cloud simplifies network security, eliminating the need for traditional VPNs, and provides a more secure and efficient way to connect users to private applications, regardless of where the users or the applications are located.

    Axis Security users on PeerSpot have highlighted the ease of deployment and the non-intrusive nature of Axis Security's solution as major advantages. One IT Director noted, "The implementation was straightforward and didn’t disrupt our existing operations, which was a major plus." Another user, a Security Manager, praised the platform's robust security features, saying, "Axis Security has significantly enhanced our ability to control and monitor application access, giving us peace of mind in our security operations."

    Axis Security follows the principles of zero-trust architecture, which means it treats every access request as potentially untrusted, regardless of the user's location or network. It applies rigorous authentication and authorization controls to ensure only authorized users can access specific applications and resources. Axis Security enables secure remote access to applications and services without requiring a VPN (Virtual Private Network). It establishes a secure connection between users and applications, protecting against potential threats and reducing the attack surface.

    With Axis Security, organizations can granularly control user access to specific applications or services. This ensures that users only have access to the resources they need, reducing the risk of unauthorized access or data breaches. The platform simplifies access management by providing a centralized control point for managing user access policies. IT administrators can define access rules based on user roles, groups, or other criteria, making it easier to enforce security policies and maintain compliance.

    Axis Security continuously monitors user activity and application access, detecting potential threats and anomalies in real-time. It provides insights into user behavior, allowing organizations to identify and mitigate security risks promptly.

    Axis Security is built on a cloud-native architecture, allowing it to scale and adapt to dynamic cloud environments. It can seamlessly integrate with various cloud services and supports hybrid deployments, making it suitable for organizations with diverse infrastructure setups.

      Axis Security aims to provide secure and simplified remote access to applications while adhering to the principles of zero trust. By implementing granular access controls and continuous monitoring, it helps organizations protect their critical resources and reduce the risk of unauthorized access or data breaches.

      The Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange enables fast, secure connections and allows your employees to work from anywhere using the internet as the corporate network. Based on the zero trust principle of least-privileged access, it provides comprehensive security using context-based identity and policy enforcement.

      The Zero Trust Exchange operates across 150 data centers worldwide, ensuring that the service is close to your users, co-located with the cloud providers and applications they are accessing, such as Microsoft 365 and AWS. It guarantees the shortest path between your users and their destinations, providing comprehensive security and an amazing user experience.

      Sample Customers
      Cardenas Markets, Armis, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Visionworks
      Siemens, AutoNation, GE, NOV
      Top Industries
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Computer Software Company20%
      Financial Services Firm10%
      Manufacturing Company10%
      Government6%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Computer Software Company18%
      Educational Organization14%
      Manufacturing Company6%
      Healthcare Company6%
      REVIEWERS
      Manufacturing Company29%
      Computer Software Company29%
      Financial Services Firm12%
      Pharma/Biotech Company6%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Computer Software Company18%
      Financial Services Firm11%
      Manufacturing Company10%
      Government7%
      Company Size
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business22%
      Midsize Enterprise16%
      Large Enterprise62%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business29%
      Midsize Enterprise24%
      Large Enterprise47%
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business29%
      Midsize Enterprise14%
      Large Enterprise57%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business21%
      Midsize Enterprise14%
      Large Enterprise66%
      Buyer's Guide
      ZTNA as a Service
      March 2024
      Find out what your peers are saying about Zscaler, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in ZTNA as a Service. Updated: March 2024.
      768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

      Axis Security is ranked 12th in ZTNA as a Service with 5 reviews while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is ranked 1st in ZTNA as a Service with 34 reviews. Axis Security is rated 9.6, while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Axis Security writes "Easy to deploy, improved reliability and performance of our connectivity, and greatly reduced costs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange writes "Allows for strict access control, granting access to specific applications at a URL level rather than at the physical IP level". Axis Security is most compared with Netskope , Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet FortiGate SWG, Cato SASE Cloud Platform and Zscaler B2B, whereas Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is most compared with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cato SASE Cloud Platform, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Cloudflare Access and Perimeter 81.

      See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors and best Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) vendors.

      We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.