Compare Azure Active Directory vs. OpenIAM Access Manager

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Okta, ForgeRock and others in Access Management. Updated: July 2021.
523,742 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Licensing fees are paid on a monthly basis and the cost depends on the number of users.""This product is sold as part of the enterprise package and our licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.""MFA and P2 licenses for two Azures for fully-enabled scenarios and features cost a lot of money. This is where Okta is trying to get the prices down.""We are a non-profit organization, so we get good prices from Microsoft for their products. It is working well, but it could be cheaper. For the type of organization we are, it would be good if they could give a little bit more and be more generous like Google, which has completely free services. Microsoft has free versions or web services called Office 365 E1, which is free for use, but we want to have it with more qualified clients.""We pay about $35 per user.""I think we're on the E3 — I think it was about 35 dollars per user.""We got a good deal. If you get rid of all the products providing features that Azure Suite can provide, then it makes sense cost-wise.""Microsoft has a free version of Azure AD. So, if you don't do a lot of advanced features, then you can use the free version, which is no cost at all because it is underpinning Office 365. Because Microsoft gives it to you as a SaaS, so there are no infrastructure costs whatsoever that you need to incur. If you use the free version, then it is free. If you use the advanced features (that we use), it is a license fee per user."

More Azure Active Directory Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
523,742 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable features of this solution are security, the conditional access feature, and multifactor authentication.
Top Answer: The pricing is very flexible. There are a few tiers of licensing, and it is a part of an enterprise contract. It is bundled with other services and the pricing is quite reasonable.
Top Answer: The management interface has some areas that need improvement. It doesn't give you an overview similar to a dashboard view for Azure Active Directory. The view can be complicated. There are many… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
1st
out of 28 in Access Management
Views
14,530
Comparisons
11,720
Reviews
38
Average Words per Review
1,122
Rating
8.5
22nd
out of 28 in Access Management
Views
288
Comparisons
264
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
OpenIAM
Video Not Available
Overview

The Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) enterprise identity service provides single sign-on and multi-factor authentication to help protect your users from 99.9 percent of cybersecurity attacks. With Azure Active Directory, you get:

- Single sign-on enabling access to your apps from anywhere

- Conditional Access and multi-factor authentication to help protect and govern access

- A single identity platform to engage with internal and external users more securely

- Developer tools to easily integrate identity into your apps and services 

To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Azure Active Directory Community.

The Web Access Manager is an integral part of the OpenIAM platform. The Access Manager provides a scalable, secure and consistent solution to access applications in hybrid environments for both corporate (employees) and consumers (external) alike.

The Access Manager provides organizations with the following tools to enable these objectives:

Web SSO with support for SAML 2, oAuth 2, OIDC, and a rProxy to allow SSO to legacy applications
Adaptive Authentication
Multifactor Authentication (MFA)
Social Sign-on
Authorization
Session Management
Device registration
Fine grained audit logging

Offer
Learn more about Azure Active Directory
Learn more about OpenIAM Access Manager
Sample Customers
Azure Active Directory is trusted by companies of all sizes and industries including Walmart, Zscaler, Uniper, Amtrak, monday.com, and more.
Electric Insurance Company, Rochester Regional Health Information Organization, Banco de Portugal, Tata Communications, TUI Hotels
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm15%
Computer Software Company12%
Manufacturing Company9%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm6%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise55%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise81%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Okta, ForgeRock and others in Access Management. Updated: July 2021.
523,742 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Azure Active Directory is ranked 1st in Access Management with 39 reviews while OpenIAM Access Manager is ranked 22nd in Access Management. Azure Active Directory is rated 8.4, while OpenIAM Access Manager is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Azure Active Directory writes "With multi-factor authentication, we've seen a marked decrease in the number of threats we've seen come through". On the other hand, Azure Active Directory is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Google Cloud Identity, AWS Directory Service and ForgeRock, whereas OpenIAM Access Manager is most compared with Gluu and Okta Workforce Identity.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.