Compare Azure Cost Management vs. Nutanix Xi Beam

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Turbonomic Logo
9,360 views|4,335 comparisons
Azure Cost Management Logo
2,091 views|1,816 comparisons
Nutanix Xi Beam Logo
777 views|576 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Cost Management vs. Nutanix Xi Beam and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
509,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"I only deal with the infrastructure side, so I really couldn't speak to more than load balancing as the most valuable feature for me. It provides specific actions that prevent resource starvation. It always keeps things in perfect balance.""I have the ability to automate things similar to the Orchestrator stuff. I do have the ability to have it do some balancing, and if it sees some different performance metrics that I've set not being met, it'll actually move some of my virtual machines from, let's say, one host to another. It is sort of an automation tool that helps me. Basically, I specify the metric, and if I get a certain host or something being over-utilized, it'll automatically move the virtual machines around for me. It basically has to snap into my vCenter and then it can make adjustments and move my virtual machines around. It also has some very nice reporting tools built around virtual machines. It tells you how much storage, memory, or CPU is being used monthly, and then it gives you a very nice way to be able to send out billing structure to your end users who use servers within your environment.""It also brings up a list of machines and if something is under-provisioned and needs more compute power it will tell you, 'This server needs more compute power, and we suggest you raise it up to this level.' It will even automatically do it for you. In Azure, you don't have to actually go into the cloud provider to resize. You can just say, 'Apply these resizes,' and Turbonomic uses some back-end APIs to make the changes for you.""The automated memory balancing, where it looks at whether it's being used in the most efficient way and adds or takes away memory, is the best part. If it didn't do that, it would be something that I would have to do. We have too many machines for one person to do that. The automation helps me in that it is done in a really efficient way and a balanced way because of the policies. It really helps.""It has automated a lot of things. We have saved 30 to 35 percent in human resource time and cost, which is pretty substantial. We don't have a big workforce here, so we have to use all the automation we can get.""The proactive monitoring of all our open enrollment applications has improved our organization. We have used it to size applications that we are moving to the cloud. Therefore, when we move them out there, we have them appropriately sized. We use it for reporting to current application owners, showing them where they are wasting money. There are easy things to find for an application, e.g., they decommissioned the server, but they never took care of the storage. Without a tool like this, that storage would just sit there forever, with us getting billed for it.""Turbonomic has helped optimize cloud operations and reduced our cloud costs significantly. Overall, we are at about 40 percent savings, and we spend about three million a year just in Azure. It reduces the size of the VMs, putting them into the right template for usage. People don't realize that you don't have to future-proof a virtual machine in Azure. You just need to build it for today. As the business or service grows, you can scale up or out. About 90 percent of all the costs that we've reduced has been from sizing machines appropriately.""We have a system where our developers automate machine builds, and that is constantly running out of resources. Turbonomic helps us with that, so I don't have to keep buying hardware. The developers always say, "They don't have enough. They don't have enough. They don't have enough," when they just configured it improperly. Therefore, Turbonomic helps us identify configuration issues on their side so it doesn't cost me money on the other end to buy resources that I don't really need."

More Turbonomic Pros »

"The advisor recommendations feature is the most valuable feature. It helps set your environment in a clean state.""The features that I have found most valuable, are the trend analysis and the budgetary trigger.""Microsoft Azure Cloud Cost Management is easy to use and we have a lot of insights about all of our goals.""The most valuable feature is that it helps us to better forecast and reduce costs.""Good control features and user interface.""Microsoft's technical support is good.""The most valuable aspect of the solution is the fact that it's extremely customizable. It makes it very flexible in terms of usage.""The interface is good, and it's easy to manage."

More Azure Cost Management Pros »

"The Nutanix technical support is very, very good.""The most valuable features are the compliance features and the chargebacks.""The executive dashboard is valuable and provides a complete sense of the whole infrastructure."

More Nutanix Xi Beam Pros »

Cons
"It would be good for Turbonomic, on their side, to integrate with other companies like AppDynamics or SolarWinds or other monitoring softwares. I feel that the actual monitoring of applications, mixed in with their abilities, would help. That would be the case wherever Turbonomic lacks the ability to monitor an application or in cases where applications are so customized that it's not going to be able to handle them. There is monitoring that you can do with scripting that you may not be able to do with Turbonomic.""It sometimes does get false positives. Sometimes, it'll move something when it really wasn't a performance metric. I've seen it do that, but it's pretty much an automated tool for performance. We've only got about 500 virtual machines, so lots of times, I'm able to manage it physically, but it's definitely a nice tool for a larger enterprise that might be managing 2,000 or 3,000 virtual machines.""There is room for improvement [with] upgrades. We have deployed the newer version, version 8 of Turbonomic. The problem is that there is no way to upgrade between major Turbonomic versions. You can upgrade minor versions without a problem, but when you go from version 6 to version 7, or version 7 to version 8, you basically have to deploy it new and let it start gathering data again. That is a problem because all of the data, all of the savings calculations that had been done on the old version, are gone. There's no way to keep track of your lifetime savings across versions.""The planning and costing areas could be a little bit more detailed. When you have more than 2,000 machines, the reports don't work properly. They need to fix it so that the reports work when you use that many virtual machines.""There are a few things that we did notice. It does kind of seem to run away from itself a little bit. It does seem to have a mind of its own sometimes. It goes out there and just kind of goes crazy. There needs to be something that kind of throttles things back a little bit. I have personally seen where we've been working on things, then pulled servers out of the VMware cluster and found that Turbonomic was still trying to ship resources to and from that node. So, there has to be some kind of throttling or ability for it to not be so buggy in that area. Because we've pulled nodes out of a cluster into maintenance mode, then brought it back up, and it tried to put workloads on that outside of a cluster. There may be something that is available for this, but it seems very kludgy to me.""The issue for us with the automation is we are considering starting to do the hot adds, but there are some problems with Windows Server 2019 and hot adds. It is a little buggy. So, if we turn that on with a cluster that has a lot of Windows 2019 Servers, then we would see a blue screen along with a lot of applications as well. Depending on what you are adding, cores or memory, it doesn't necessarily even take advantage of that at that moment. A reboot may be required, and we can't do that until later. So, that decreases the benefit of the real-time. For us, there is a lot of risk with real-time.""I would love to see Turbonomic analyze backup data. We have had people in the past put servers into daily full backups with seven-year retention and where the disk size is two terabytes. So, every single day, there is a two terabyte snapshot put into a Blob somewhere. I would love to see Turbonomic say, "Here are all your backups along with the age of them," to help us manage the savings by not having us spend so much on the storage in Azure. That would be huge.""They could add a few more reports. They could also be a bit more granular. While they have reports, sometimes it is hard to figure out what you are looking for just by looking at the date."

More Turbonomic Cons »

"It would be nice if they could introduce connections to other clouds. It would be good to connect to AWS and Oracle cloud.""I would like the developers to add more features about migration, like how much it would cost to migrate from, let's say, AWS to Azure.""If it worked better with other cloud providers it would be better.""I would like to see better customization.""Be wary of unnecessary costs.""The initial setup is a little bit complex.""The solution could use automatic emailing. That would help improve the product a lot, at least for our purposes.""Optimization and scalability could be increased."

More Azure Cost Management Cons »

"In this solution, it is difficult to organize the VM folders and subfolders.""In the next release, I would like to see more cloud providers like Micro BH or local providers.""Few systems are not business-critical, but they run 24/7."

More Nutanix Xi Beam Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"If you're a super-small business, it may be a little bit pricey for you... But in large, enterprise companies where money is, maybe, less of an issue, Turbonomic is not that expensive. I can't imagine why any big company would not buy it, for what it does.""It was an annual buy-in. You basically purchase it based on your host type stuff. The buy-in was about 20K, and the annual maintenance is about $3,000 a year.""I'm not involved in any of the billing, but my understanding is that is fairly expensive.""We see ROI in extended support agreements (ESA) for old software. Migration activities seem to be where Turbonomic has really benefited us the most. It's one click and done. We have new machines ready to go with Turbonomic, which are properly sized instead of somebody sitting there with a spreadsheet and guessing. So, my return on investment would certainly be on currency, from a software and hardware perspective.""When we have expanded our licensing, it has always been easy to make an ROI-based decision. So, it's reasonably priced. We would like to have it cheaper, but we get more benefit from it than we pay for it. At the end of the day, that's all you can hope for.""I know there have been some issues with the billing, when the numbers were first proposed, as to how much we would save. There was a huge miscommunication on our part. Turbonomic was led to believe that we could optimize our AWS footprint, because we didn't know we couldn't. So, we were promised savings of $750,000. Then, when we came to implement Turbonomic, the developers in AWS said, "Absolutely not. You're not putting that in our environment. We can't scale down anything because they coded it." Our AWS environment is a legacy environment. It has all these old applications, where all the developers who have made it are no longer with the company. Those applications generate a ton of money for us. So, if one breaks, we are really in trouble and they didn't want to have to deal with an environment that was changing and couldn't be supported. That number went from $750,000 to about $450,000. However, that wasn't Turbonomic's fault.""It is an endpoint type license, which is fine. It is not overly expensive.""The pricing and licensing are fair. We purchase based on benchmark pricing, which we have been able to get. There are no surprise charges nor hidden fees."

More Turbonomic Pricing and Cost Advice »

"It's free out of the box.""I think the solution was free initially.""Based on the transitional cost we charge, it's not expensive, but could be better."

More Azure Cost Management Pricing and Cost Advice »

"I think it can be more cost-effective."

More Nutanix Xi Beam Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.
509,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The product is fairly priced right now. Given its capabilities, it is excellently priced. We think that the product will… more »
Top Answer: One ask that I'm waiting for, now that they have the ability to make recommendations for disks, for volumes, and disk… more »
Top Answer: We use the Reserved Instances and the recommendations of sizing of our family types in Azure. We use it for cost… more »
Top Answer: We don't actually use the Azure Cost Management features. We have our own capabilities. We put our own technology on top… more »
Top Answer: Based on the transitional cost we charge, it's not expensive, but could be better.
Top Answer: The policy-based remediation is probably the biggest area where Azure is lacking and that's why we sell a lot of our… more »
Top Answer: The executive dashboard is valuable and provides a complete sense of the whole infrastructure.
Top Answer: Initially, it was monthly, and now it's on a yearly basis.
Top Answer: I think Nutanix Xi Beam can be more cost-effective. This product should have a sense of what their users need. Few… more »
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
VMTurbo Operations Manager
Microsoft Azure Cost Management, Cloudyn
Nutanix Beam, Botmetric
Learn More
Overview

Turbonomic Application Resource Management matches application demand to infrastructure supply to continuously ensure application performance. The software integrates with leading APM and IT service management solutions to form a control plane to automate IT resource management, on-premises and in multicloud environments.

Azure Cost Management empowers organizations to monitor cloud spend, drive organizational accountabilities, and optimize cloud efficiency so they can accelerate future cloud investments with confidence.

Beam is a multi-cloud optimization service delivered as part of the Nutanix Enterprise Cloud OS. Beam provides organizations with deep visibility and rich analytics detailing cloud consumption patterns, along with one-click cost optimization across their cloud environments.

For more information: https://www.nutanix.com/products/beam/signup-3/

Offer
Learn more about Turbonomic
Learn more about Azure Cost Management
Learn more about Nutanix Xi Beam
Sample Customers
JPMorgan Chase, First Canadian Title, UBS, Aetna, Alpha Maxx, London School of Economics, Expedia, JMC Steel Group, Southern Waste Systems.
Quixey, Infomedia, Panaya, Wix.com, Mirabeau, Mi9, GetTaxi, Outsmart Studios, Bownty, BlazeMeter: The Load Testing Cloud, Irdeto, Effective Measure, Totango, Nextdoor, BranchOut, The BioTeam, Evolven, Netotiate, ClickSoftware
Samsung, Axcient, Jitterbit, Calance, Metabiota
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company14%
Financial Services Firm13%
Manufacturing Company12%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider24%
Financial Services Firm6%
Media Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm7%
Media Company4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider29%
Media Company4%
Government3%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise63%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business44%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise32%
REVIEWERS
Small Business8%
Large Enterprise92%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Cost Management vs. Nutanix Xi Beam and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
509,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Azure Cost Management is ranked 3rd in Cloud Cost Management with 9 reviews while Nutanix Xi Beam is ranked 9th in Cloud Cost Management with 3 reviews. Azure Cost Management is rated 7.4, while Nutanix Xi Beam is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Azure Cost Management writes "Good reporting and ideal for small to medium-sized companies but needs better policy-based remediation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Xi Beam writes "An excellent executive dashboard, but it doesn't show peak utilization and make recommendations". Azure Cost Management is most compared with CloudHealth, AWS Savings Plans, CloudCheckr Cloud Management Platform, Cloudability and Oracle Analytics Cloud, whereas Nutanix Xi Beam is most compared with CloudHealth, Cloudability, vRealize Business for Cloud, CloudCheckr Cloud Management Platform and AWS Cost Management. See our Azure Cost Management vs. Nutanix Xi Beam report.

See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.