We performed a comparison between Azure Monitor and CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."The solution very easily integrates with Azure services and in one click you can monitor your resource."
"Azure Monitor is useful because of the useful application insights and telemetry, such as metrics and logs."
"One of the most useful aspects of this solution is the out-of-the-box functionality on all areas, especially on Application Insights, zero instrumentation, and artificial intelligence for event correlation."
"The most valuable feature is that it ensures our servers are up."
"Provides an overview and high-level information."
"It's a service from Microsoft, so it will scale."
"Among the valuable features of this solution, Application Insights stands out as one of the most significant. It provides insights into application performance and helps identify issues and bottlenecks."
"The most valuable features of Azure Monitor are the login analytics workspace and we can write any kind of custom queries in order to receive the data that is inserted into the login analytics workspace, diagnostic settings, et cetera."
"The pricing is relatively low compared to other solutions in this area. I'd go so far as to say it's even significantly less than the competition."
"The most valuable feature is the fault management monitoring."
"This solution could be improved with more out-of-the-box functionalities and artificial intelligence to complete event correlation."
"Currently, it seems it's complicated to get the correct information in terms of what to do and how things work."
"The solution's monitoring feature has limitations for analyzing multiple metrics."
"They should include advanced logging on the database level in the Azure pool."
"Azure Monitor could improve the visualization aspect and integrate better with other third-party services."
"Setting up this solution is complex. It's also missing the functionality of assigning alerts."
"Automation related to gathering metrics from more applications could be improved."
"I'd like the solution to do more around vulnerability assessment. It's lacking in the product right now."
"The user interface needs improvement."
"My biggest complaint about ADA is that you have to rely on dedicated appliances."
More CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Azure Monitor is ranked 4th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 44 reviews while CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Azure Monitor is rated 7.6, while CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Azure Monitor writes "A powerful Kusto query language but the alerting mechanism needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] writes "Impressive ability to show potential slow downs. ". Azure Monitor is most compared with Datadog, Dynatrace, Prometheus, Sentry and Grafana, whereas CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
