Compare Azure Monitor vs. CA Application Delivery Analysis

Azure Monitor is ranked 10th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 7 reviews while CA Application Delivery Analysis is ranked 28th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 2 reviews. Azure Monitor is rated 8.0, while CA Application Delivery Analysis is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Azure Monitor writes "This integrated add-on for Microsoft Azure helps monitor performance of the base product ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CA Application Delivery Analysis writes "Good monitoring functionality, but technical support and integration with other products need to be improved". Azure Monitor is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog and Splunk, whereas CA Application Delivery Analysis is most compared with CA APM and Gigamon. See our Azure Monitor vs. CA Application Delivery Analysis report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Monitor vs. CA Application Delivery Analysis and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
405,734 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The solution works well overall. It's easy to implement and simple to use.The most valuable feature is that it ensures our servers are up.The most valuable feature is that it's stable. It hasn't crossed any thresholds.A product that is well-integrated for monitoring Microsoft Azure.The solution integrates well with the Microsoft platform.It's a service from Microsoft, so it will scale.I am impressed by the reporting on the average eight ports that we get from this solution.

Read more »

The most valuable feature is the fault management monitoring.The pricing is relatively low compared to other solutions in this area. I'd go so far as to say it's even significantly less than the competition.

Read more »

Cons
I'd like the solution to do more around vulnerability assessment. It's lacking in the product right now.When something goes down, we want the option to have automation in place to get it back up again as quickly as possible.The troubleshooting logs need improvement. There should be some improvement there. I have a hard time finding the right logs at the right times whenever there is an issue occurring.As a younger product it still has room for feature improvement and enhancement.n comparison to New Relic, which I've used before, it's a bit more complicated. It's not as easy to use. It also took some time to get it working. The implementation needs to be simpler.They can simplify the overall complexity since you have multiple data sources in the cloud for monitoring. It's quite simple, but there are so many portals. It takes time to work with it. If they could simplify the user configuration, that would be good.They need to work on a more hybrid deployment that will allow us to monitor local on-premise deployments and connect to different systems. I would like to see more integration.

Read more »

My biggest complaint about ADA is that you have to rely on dedicated appliances.The user interface needs improvement.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
This is an expensive solution and there is a single price to pay for licensing, with no options.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Management (APM) solutions are best for your needs.
405,734 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
1,489
Comparisons
1,226
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
434
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
443
Comparisons
239
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
326
Avg. Rating
6.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 34% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Also Known As
CA ADA, Application Delivery Analysis, NetQoS SuperAgent
Learn
Microsoft
Broadcom
Overview

Azure Monitor maximizes the availability and performance of your applications by delivering a comprehensive solution for collecting, analyzing, and acting on telemetry from your cloud and on-premises environments. It helps you understand how your applications are performing and proactively identifies issues affecting them and the resources they depend on.

CA Application Delivery Analysis provides end-to-end response time monitoring at multiple component levels, giving Network Administrators the ability to quickly identify performance bottlenecks and to identify root cause in minutes as opposed to hours or days, resulting in up to 80% improvement in IT productivity and reduced Mean Time To Repair (MTTR).

Offer
Learn more about Azure Monitor
Learn more about CA Application Delivery Analysis
Sample Customers
Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group ERGO
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company48%
Comms Service Provider9%
Manufacturing Company8%
Insurance Company7%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Monitor vs. CA Application Delivery Analysis and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
405,734 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.