We performed a comparison between Azure Stack and Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is pretty stable."
"The setup is very straightforward and it's quite stable."
"If a user wants to upgrade Office 365 from any of the packages, there is no disruption happening during migration, and the data is kept safe. There's no loss of data."
"The most valuable thing about Azure Stack is that it provides a unified control panel for managing cloud services."
"Azure Stack provides us with computational power. We also get an option to have it with Azure Cloud, which is beneficial. We don't need to buy any other extra servers or any virtual machines with high-end graphics."
"It is very easy to learn and apply to other things."
"The admin dashboard is the main feature of the solution."
"The tool has simplified our application development."
"The most valuable feature is having the full features of my Nutanix on-premises applications in the cloud."
"The solution can scale well."
"Having a single pane of glass where you can have both your on-prem and anything else that you spin up within AWS is useful."
"The scalability is good."
"I've been very pleased with their support overall."
"In terms of dealing with our business-critical workloads, Nutanix is a highly scalable, highly resilient, and very high-performing solution."
"The most valuable feature of Nutanix Clusters is to protect the data."
"The overall infrastructure is the most valuable part of Nutanix Cloud Clusters."
"I would like to see better support for containers."
"In the future, I would like to see more machine learning features."
"Azure Stack could use some improvement when it comes to seamless support for disaster recovery scenarios of higher availability regarding multi-regions."
"It would be better to have more services and functionality when it comes to database software and computing."
"Azure Stack is relatively new and lacks the features compared to public Azure."
"Azure Stack doesn't have all the services available in Microsoft Azure."
"It should be improved in terms of integrations. It could be integrated more with external tools."
"The price of the OCR could be more competitive with Google."
"The pricing can be better."
"Perhaps the one thing that could be improved is the documentation around the solution."
"The technical support for Nutanix Clusters could be better."
"Some of the interfaces aren't as intuitive as they should be."
"I'd like more flexible options to get in and out of migration modes."
"There are still some things that could be improved about the product."
"We've had some challenges with the implementation."
"The biggest weakness with Clusters at this point is that the adoption rate is low because customers don't know enough about it."
Azure Stack is ranked 1st in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms with 56 reviews while Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is ranked 5th in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms with 9 reviews. Azure Stack is rated 8.0, while Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Azure Stack writes "Effective tool for cloud and on-premise environments that offers seamless deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) writes "Helps manage costs, eliminates waste, and has excellent technical support". Azure Stack is most compared with VMware Cloud Foundation, AWS Outposts, Google Anthos, VMware Software Defined Data Center and Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI), whereas Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is most compared with VMware Cloud Foundation, AWS Outposts, VMware Cloud on AWS, Microsoft Azure and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI). See our Azure Stack vs. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) report.
See our list of best Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
