We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Signal Sciences

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Microsoft, Amazon and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: October 2021.
540,884 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We have an enterprise agreement with Microsoft and the pricing is good.""The price is for this solution is fair and there is a license needed.""The price of the solution depends on your architecture and how you manage it. You can control the cost in Azure quite well. The costs do not directly correlate to expenses in the features we are using."

More Azure Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
540,884 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It has been a stable product in my experience.
Top Answer: The price is for this solution is fair and there is a license needed.
Top Answer: There is a need to be able to configure the solution more. In the future, I would like to see the ability to activate using a public or private IP.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
520
Comparisons
429
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
299
Rating
8.0
Views
2,408
Comparisons
1,634
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Signal Sciences Next-Gen WAF, Signal Sciences RASP
Learn More
Fastly
Video Not Available
Overview

Web Application Firewall (WAF) provides centralized protection of your web applications from common exploits and vulnerabilities. Web applications are increasingly targeted by malicious attacks that exploit commonly known vulnerabilities. SQL injection and cross-site scripting are among the most common attacks.

Signal Sciences' next-gen web application firewall (WAF) and runtime application self protection (RASP) increase security and maintain reliability without sacrificing velocity - all at the lowest total cost of ownership.

Offer
Learn more about Azure Web Application Firewall
Learn more about Signal Sciences
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Chef, Adobe, Datadog, Etsy, GrubHub, Vimeo, SendGrid, Under Armour, Duo, AppNexus
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider21%
Insurance Company11%
Manufacturing Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Microsoft, Amazon and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: October 2021.
540,884 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Azure Web Application Firewall is ranked 21st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 4 reviews while Signal Sciences is ranked 24th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Azure Web Application Firewall is rated 8.2, while Signal Sciences is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Azure Web Application Firewall writes "Straightforward to set up, brilliant support, and it allows us to publish applications behind the firewall". On the other hand, Azure Web Application Firewall is most compared with AWS WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Imperva Incapsula, whereas Signal Sciences is most compared with AWS WAF, Cloudflare, Akamai Kona Site Defender, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and Sqreen.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.