We performed a comparison between Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 and Microsoft DPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Commvault, Veeam Software, N-able and others in SaaS Backup."The most valuable feature includes leaving the stub files behind and integrating that with the recenter feature."
"The stability has always been very good."
"The solution has good scalability."
"Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 is easy to use."
More Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 Pros →
"The initial setup is quite straightforward."
"I like the core backup feature. I also like the file server backup feature. I find Microsoft DPM interesting because it has fantastic integration with Microsoft products. For example, in Exchange and SharePoint, DPM is excellent when it comes to backing up data. It also does a decent job with open-source products."
"The automated procedure is quite good for us, as it is able to capture all of the information that we require."
"The solution backs up Microsoft workloads as well as anything on the market."
"Its capability to give a BMR for all the workstations that I want to connect to."
"It has an application backup, a file backup, a system backup and a hypervisor."
"I could back up all the stuff we had, even the VMs we have for Hyper V."
"The most valuable feature is that DPM has an index so individual files can be searched."
"The solution's updates and rollouts of the patches cause a lot of problems."
"I think the solution itself keeps up with everything else. Sometimes it would be nice if they could move a little bit quicker and have faster updates, but in terms of the features, it's absolutely fine and adequate."
"The user experience needs a little refreshing touch."
"We need more options for the backup schedule."
More Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 Cons →
"The user interface can be improved quite a bit."
"There is a very poor online user community in terms of people blogging about their experiences with DPM."
"The problem lies with the 2019 version, it's the file system they’re using."
"It would be better if it integrated seamlessly with open source and competitor products. In the next release, I would like to see some data governance frameworks. It should have support features for data integration and data replication like Veeam. Right now, we are also using Veeam for certain scenarios."
"Compatibility and integration with other products needs improvement."
"The user friendliness could be improved."
"Microsoft DPM could improve if it was available in a public or private cloud."
"Additional Hyper-V knowledge would be great."
More Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 Pricing and Cost Advice →
Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 is ranked 14th in SaaS Backup with 4 reviews while Microsoft DPM is ranked 28th in Backup and Recovery with 17 reviews. Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 is rated 8.2, while Microsoft DPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 writes "Allows for storage optimization and archiving functionality of DocAve Backup is valuable for organizations with large amounts of data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft DPM writes "Good for backing up, but the 2019 version lags". Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 is most compared with Code42 Incydr and IBM Spectrum Protect Plus, whereas Microsoft DPM is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Azure Backup, Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain), Commvault Cloud and Veritas Backup Exec.
We monitor all SaaS Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.