We compared Barracuda Intronis Backup and NinjaOne across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Features: Barracuda Intronis Backup is praised for its strong backup capabilities, user-friendly cloud management portal, and staff training opportunities. NinjaOne is highly regarded for its effective monitoring and management features, remote device management, and streamlined software deployments.
Room for Improvement: The Barracuda Intronis Backup could improve its integration, speed, and orchestration capabilities. NinjaOne could benefit from improved remote connectivity, enhanced reporting, a more user-friendly ticketing system.
Service and Support: Customers have consistently praised Barracuda Intronis Backup for their excellent and knowledgeable technical support. However, some reviewers reported challenges with escalation and communication within the support team. NinjaOne generally earned positive feedback for its customer service. Customers expressed satisfaction with issue resolution and comprehensive documentation. However, some reported slow responses from technical support.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for Barracuda Intronis Backup is simple and involves configuring IP settings and connecting to Cloud Control. NinjaOne's setup is generally uncomplicated. It may take a few minutes or a full day, depending on the situation.
Pricing: Barracuda Intronis Backup provides a comprehensive and reasonably priced setup package. NinjaOne offers negotiable pricing based on the number of devices, with discounted costs as the scale increases. However, some users perceive NinjaOne as costlier than alternatives.
ROI: Barracuda Intronis Backup provides added financial benefits and time efficiency. NinjaOne delivers a return over time by improving productivity.
Comparison Results: Barracuda Intronis Backup stands out for its extensive training resources and direct cloud mapping, but users would like to see better performance and integration. NinjaOne is praised for its ease of setup and valuable monitoring and management features. However, users say NinjaOne could do a better job optimizing internet connections and managing mobile devices.
"The configuration and the onboarding process are pretty good."
"The product is easy to install and use while doing what it is expected to do."
"The most valuable feature is the speed of backup, which is very good compared to other solutions."
"Barracuda's support is probably one of the best things about them, even with all their solutions. With any problem that we have, or even questions, we get the assistance that we need. The turnaround is pretty quick."
"We perform backup drills to test the functionality, and we don't have any problems."
"The most valuable feature is unlimited data storage on the cloud. Even if the employee has left the company for a few years, the backup will still be maintained."
"It is very stable, and I'm very happy with this solution."
"I have found the product's LiveBoot feature to be most valuable."
"We can use it for remote monitoring, and it also works great as a troubleshooting tool. We are able to open up a command line or a PowerShell session remotely without having to disrupt the user. They have a limited network device monitoring capability, but for workstation servers, we have the event logs. We can do performance monitoring, system changes, software deployment, and patch management. We can also push scripts. It has a very simple web interface. There are no additional things to do there. Security is also pretty good. It does the same things that the other competitor's tools do. One of the advantages of Ninja is that they have a more capable mobile app, which allows you to see the alerts immediately. I get alerted to major critical issues."
"Good at managing updates and for remote support."
"The installation is easy, it only took two minutes."
"The tool's most valuable feature is third-party application updates."
"The most valuable feature we have found currently is probably patch management."
"The policies are probably the most valuable features. They're similar in function to Microsoft group policies where we can have it monitor certain things or push out software on a schedule. I would rate the policies eight out of 10. They're robust, I could monitor most of the things that Windows Performance Monitoring keeps tabs on."
"It just works as advertised and serves the purpose for which we got it."
"NinjaOne helps us view the status of software patching, whether the PC is locked or unlocked."
"We cannot backup Sun Micro systems. They are not currently supported."
"The web interface needs to contain a more up-to-date view of the hardware."
"The solution depends on your connectivity, so it is essential to have a proper connection to the cloud."
"In the next release of this solution, I would like to see cloud support and deduplication functionality."
"I would like to see better integration with third-party applications."
"Some features like CIFS are not supported that would help speed and flexibility."
"I would like to see the automatic backup of critical applications to the cloud."
"Barracuda works great for smaller network environments, which are not that complex. It is hardware-based with a Linux core, which you don't have access to, and a lot of stuff happens on the back-end. Even from a troubleshooting perspective, it is a bit challenging."
"NinjaOne's pricing and user interface needs improvement."
"It can have more integrations with third-party providers, such as Deep Instinct. They do partner with certain antivirus or remote access tool partners, but they can increase their portfolio to have more choices."
"I want NinjaOne to improve the reports."
"The ticketing system in NinjaOne is not the best."
"I wish that they integrated it with more antivirus solutions. Currently, they only push Defender, but it doesn't really have integration with SentinelOne. It also didn't integrate with Trend Micro, which we were using previously. I would also like to have more control from the mobile app. As of now, I am able to see some performance values, but I can't see, for example, disk activity or disk performance values. If they can improve their app a little bit, it would help greatly. They can also improve the tech interface. If I assign certain techs to a bunch of specific machines, they only get those alerts that they're assigned to."
"NinjaOne's reporting module is cumbersome."
"The solution could improve by optimizing the internet connection being used."
"Lacks sufficient integrations with other PSAs."
Barracuda Intronis Backup is ranked 5th in MSP Backup with 24 reviews while NinjaOne is ranked 4th in MSP Backup with 14 reviews. Barracuda Intronis Backup is rated 8.4, while NinjaOne is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Barracuda Intronis Backup writes "Finding data to restore is much easier than rummaging through tapes to find backups". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NinjaOne writes "A tool that helps with a lot of configurations and creates automation processes that work perfectly". Barracuda Intronis Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Acronis Cyber Protect and Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain), whereas NinjaOne is most compared with Atera, N-able N-central, Microsoft Configuration Manager, LogMeIn Central and ConnectWise Automate. See our Barracuda Intronis Backup vs. NinjaOne report.
See our list of best MSP Backup vendors.
We monitor all MSP Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
