We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Bionic vs. HCL AppScan

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Veracode Logo
64,927 views|35,377 comparisons
Bionic Logo
4 views|1 comparisons
HCL AppScan Logo
11,857 views|8,616 comparisons
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource, Veracode, Sonatype and others in Application Security. Updated: October 2021.
542,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization.""I don't really know about the pricing, but I'd say it's worth whatever Veracode is charging, because the solution is that good.""Veracode's price is high. I would like them to better optimize their pricing.""If I compare the pricing with other software tools, then it is quite competitive. Whatever the price is, they have always given us a good discount.""Veracode is expensive. Some of its products are expensive. I don't think it's way more expensive than its competitors. The dynamic is definitely worth it, as I think it's cheaper than the competitors. The static scan is a little bit more expensive, around 20 percent more expensive. The manual pen test is more expensive, but it is an expensive service because it's a manual pen test and we also do retests. I don't think it is way more expensive than the competitors, but it's about 15 to 20 percent more expensive.""We use this product per project rather than per developer... Your development model will really determine what the best fit is for you in terms of licensing, because of the project-based licensing. If you do a few projects, that's more attractive. If you have a large number of developers, that would also make the product a little more attractive.""The pricing is really fair compared to a lot of other tools on the market.""It is very reasonably priced compared to what we were paying our previous vendor. For the same price, we are getting much more value and reducing our AppSec costs from 40 to 50 percent."

More Veracode Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security solutions are best for your needs.
542,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: We have used SonarQube quite a lot and this is great to check code quality, security hotspots much earlier in the SDLC… more »
Top Answer: Good static analysis and dynamic analysis.
Top Answer: Veracode is very, very expensive, one of the most expensive security scanning tools available. We pay an annual license… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The solution offers services in a few specific development languages.
Top Answer: They have to improve support. Their support before, when it was IBM, was very good technical support. However, now, it's… more »
Top Answer: We primarily use the solution for static analysis.
Comparisons
Also Known As
IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan
Learn More
Overview

Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.

Assess risks to your deployment faster by understanding your applications better and eliminating the silos between security and development teams.

IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

Offer
Keep your software secure

Application security starts with secure code. Find out more about the benefits of using Veracode to keep your software secure throughout the development lifecycle.

Learn more about Bionic
Learn more about HCL AppScan
Sample Customers
State of Missouri, Rekner
Information Not Available
Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm30%
Computer Software Company12%
Insurance Company9%
Healthcare Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm10%
Manufacturing Company6%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Government27%
Manufacturing Company18%
Insurance Company18%
Aerospace/Defense Firm9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider19%
Government5%
Financial Services Firm5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise51%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise30%
Large Enterprise47%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise68%
Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource, Veracode, Sonatype and others in Application Security. Updated: October 2021.
542,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Bionic is ranked 50th in Application Security while HCL AppScan is ranked 18th in Application Security with 3 reviews. Bionic is rated 0.0, while HCL AppScan is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of HCL AppScan writes "Allows for dynamic scanning but lacks easy CI/CD integration". Bionic is most compared with , whereas HCL AppScan is most compared with SonarQube, Micro Focus Fortify on Demand, OWASP Zap, Fortify WebInspect and Checkmarx.

See our list of best Application Security vendors.

We monitor all Application Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.