We performed a comparison between Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection and Elastic Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Anti-Malware Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The endpoint protection is the solution's most valuable feature."
"I like the simplicity of this solution and the fact that it saves us time. The deployment was really straightforward and useful and I am impressed by the anti-virus endpoint detection and response offered by this solution."
"The solution has exchange protection. It has a content control, device control, a firewall, and anti-malware as well. They are all quite valuable features for us."
"Elastic Security is very easy to adapt."
"It can handle millions of loads at a time, and you can always use the filters to find exactly what you are looking for and detect errors in every log message you are searching for, basically."
"We like Elastic Security because it's a REST API-based solution. That's the primary reason we use it."
"The most valuable feature is the speed, as it responds in a very short time."
"ELK is open-source, and it will give you the framework you need to build everything from scratch."
"The most valuable features of Elastic Security are it is open-source and provides a high level of security."
"ELK Logstash is easy and fast, at least for the initial setup with the out of box uses."
"Enables monitoring of application performance and the ability to predict behaviors."
"There needs to be better integration with the environment. Especially, for the active directory and also for keeping up with the changes from Microsoft. We use a lot of Microsoft OS. I have noted that sometimes they lag behind Microsoft updates. For example, when with Windows 10. I had some issues with deploying to Windows 10 because the solution was behind in updating their own services to match the Microsoft release."
"The database needs improvement. It needs to be updated quite a bit."
"There are blurred lines between anti-virus and endpoint detection so I would say it can be confusing when you are considering buying this program. I would like to see that being explained better to the customer."
"We're using the open-source edition, for now, I think maybe they can allow their OLED plugin to be open source, as at the moment it is commercialised."
"Elastic has one problem. In the past, Elastic Security was free. Now, they currently only offer the basic license or a certain period of time."
"I would like the process of retrieving archived data and viewing it in Kibana to be simplified."
"One limitation of Elastic Security is that it does not have built-in workflows for all tasks. For example, if you need a workflow for compliance, you will need to create a custom workflow."
"The problem with ELK is it's difficult to administer. When you have a problem, it can be very, very difficult to rebuild indexes."
"The solution could also use better dashboards. They need to be more graphical, more matrix-like."
"The training that is offered for Elastic is in need of improvement because there is no depth to it."
"This solution cannot do predictive maintenance, so we have to build our own modules for doing it."
More Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection is ranked 53rd in Anti-Malware Tools while Elastic Security is ranked 5th in Log Management with 58 reviews. Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection is rated 7.4, while Elastic Security is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection writes "An excellent endpoint protection that's scalable and reasonably priced". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Elastic Security writes "A stable and scalable tool that provides visibility along with the consolidation of logs to its users". Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection is most compared with Advanced SystemCare Ultimate, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Elastic Security is most compared with Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM Security QRadar and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. See our Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection vs. Elastic Security report.
We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
