BMC Release Lifecycle Management vs OpenText Deployment Automation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BMC Release Lifecycle Management and OpenText Deployment Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
18th
out of 32 in Release Automation
Views
274
Comparisons
190
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
23rd
out of 32 in Release Automation
Views
114
Comparisons
58
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Varalogix, BMC RLM
Micro Focus Deployment Automation, Serena Deployment Automation
Learn More
Overview

Software release management doesn’t have to be difficult when you choose the right release management tools. As the volume, frequency, and complexity of your applications grow, so does the risk with each application release. With BMC Release Lifecycle Management you can mitigate risk and meet demand by enabling your DevOps team to automate and coordinate application release processes across the development and deployment lifecycle.

  • Deploy app changes faster with greater visibility and streamlined processes.
  • Lower costs by reducing downtime and increasing productivity.
  • Reduce errors with customized templates, improved collaboration, and automated deployment.
  • Remediate failed release steps during the application release automation process.

Deployment Automation enables repeatable, reliable and audit-compliant processes to simplify application deployments, reduce risk and increase the velocity of delivery across all environments of your delivery pipeline. It seamlessly enables deployment pipeline automation, reducing cycle times and providing rapid feedback on build deployments and releases into production. Reusable deployment templates allow reuse of processes and properties, simplifying the setup of new deployment processes. Supporting continuous integration and continuous deployments, Deployment Automation bridges the DevOps divide by simplifying and automating handoffs and deployments across development and operations teams. More information here.

Sample Customers
BMC Software, Sanofi, Societe Generale Group
GuideStone, TIAA CREF, EatonVance, Gordmans, D&B, Walkers,, Citi, Department of Health and Human Services USA, UBS, DTCC, Bp, Aflc, Ameritrade, Credit Agricole, Telecom Italia, GreatAmerican, Safeway, Allianz, Groupama, Generali Group.
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BMC Release Lifecycle Management is ranked 18th in Release Automation while OpenText Deployment Automation is ranked 23rd in Release Automation. BMC Release Lifecycle Management is rated 0.0, while OpenText Deployment Automation is rated 0.0. On the other hand, BMC Release Lifecycle Management is most compared with UrbanCode Deploy and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, whereas OpenText Deployment Automation is most compared with .

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.