Compare Board vs. IBM Planning Analytics

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Board Logo
2,685 views|1,597 comparisons
IBM Planning Analytics Logo
3,459 views|2,720 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Board vs. IBM Planning Analytics and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
511,773 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"By using Board we can do a lot of free analysis. We can change the layout of a table and even the end-user can change the layout of a table. And in Board 11.2 you can save the layout. That's very useful for the customer, it's a very good function.""The most valuable features are the reporting and the charts. The reporting functionality is handy for aggregation, when it comes to planning. That ability is fascinating and our users are very happy with it. The charts and the reporting allow our users to see all the data and to see how things are going this year or in the COVID situation. They're seeing everything. Instead of having to check data line by line, they're seeing it in a graph and they're seeing it in charts.""It is very easy to use. It has got what they call a toolkit, which is a no-code development environment. You can develop a whole solution with it because it is a complete platform. There is a lot of online material that can be used as a reference. You can help yourself while developing a solution. There are some prebuilt applications in the platform environment. You can very easily customize and integrate these applications. It also has flexible scaling of machine resources, which is really great."

More Board Pros »

"The most valuable feature is that it is able to slice and dice the data.""All the different platforms are well integrated.""Navigating through the data to make analysis is really quick."

More IBM Planning Analytics Pros »

Cons
"What could be better is the manual... nowadays, most people use a web client, but on the Board manual website, a lot of the information is only about the Windows client. If they could update that, it would be helpful.""Some of our users are still using an MS Office add-in for Excel for certain calculations, and when they export from Board, some of the values, some of the totals and column names, are not coming through into Excel.""It can have more functionality for narrative reporting. They should also improve their training courses, which are currently very lightweight. When you get into more complex things, it is quite difficult to figure out what you're supposed to do, and you have to look at a lot of videos before you actually understand, which is a bit frustrating. Their training can be more comprehensive."

More Board Cons »

"It's wonky, and not super user-friendly with Excel.""Extracting data is a little slow.""It would have been better if the solution was not just a tool kit."

More IBM Planning Analytics Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It is not the cheapest product on earth, but you get so much. It provides good value for money."

More Board Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Our licensing cost is approximately $50,000.00 per year."

More IBM Planning Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.
511,773 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It is very easy to use. It has got what they call a toolkit, which is a no-code development environment. You can develop a whole solution with it because it is a complete platform. There is a lot of… more »
Top Answer: It can have more functionality for narrative reporting. They should also improve their training courses, which are currently very lightweight. When you get into more complex things, it is quite… more »
Top Answer: It can be used for business intelligence, predictive planning, financial consolidation, integrated planning, budgeting and forecasting, strategy execution, and management. It can be deployed on the… more »
Top Answer: Navigating through the data to make analysis is really quick.
Top Answer: I think the price is okay, of course it's always good to have a discount.
Top Answer: It would have been better if the solution was not just a tool kit. They did not embed some functionalities already developed, we are having to develop them ourselves. It would be helpful to have… more »
Ranking
Views
2,685
Comparisons
1,597
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
745
Rating
9.0
Views
3,459
Comparisons
2,720
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
284
Rating
6.3
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Cognos TM1, IBM Cognos TM1
Learn More
Overview

BOARD International - headquartered in Switzerland - is a leading global provider of software for improving business results through better decision making. By unifying Business Intelligence and Corporate Performance Management into a single product, BOARD enables companies to achieve a shared vision of their performance across the entire organization, and thus a single version of the truth.

BOARD provides seamless solutions for • Reporting & Analysis • Budgeting, Planning & Forecasting • Profitability Modelling & Optimization • Simulation & What-if-Analysis • Scorecarding & Strategy Management • Financial Consolidation. Based on visual modelling, BOARD has enabled global companies to deploy BI and CPM applications without a single line of code in a fraction of the time and cost associated with traditional solutions.

IBM Planning Analytics is an integrated planning solution that uses AI to automate planning, budgeting, and forecasting and drive more intelligent workflows.

Built on TM1, IBM’s powerful calculation engine, this enterprise performance management tool allows you to transcend the limits of manual planning and become the Analytics Hero your business needs. Quickly and easily drive faster, more accurate plans for FP&A, sales, supply chain and beyond.

Offer
Learn more about Board
Learn more about IBM Planning Analytics
Sample Customers
Coca-Cola, Puma, Desigual, Ricoh, KPMG, H&M, Groupe SEB
ManpowerGroup, Convergys, AIG, Orchard Brands, Citibank, InterGen, Northwestern University, EF Education First, Ironside, Bazan Group, CSOB Insurance, Macquarie Group, Charles Stanley, SATO, Government of Sint Maarten, BMW Financial Services
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Government21%
Healthcare Company21%
Pharma/Biotech Company5%
Real Estate/Law Firm5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider24%
Retailer7%
Manufacturing Company4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider19%
Retailer8%
Manufacturing Company7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise41%
Large Enterprise26%
REVIEWERS
Small Business54%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise23%
Find out what your peers are saying about Board vs. IBM Planning Analytics and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
511,773 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Board is ranked 2nd in Business Performance Management with 4 reviews while IBM Planning Analytics is ranked 5th in Business Performance Management with 3 reviews. Board is rated 9.0, while IBM Planning Analytics is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of Board writes "Integration with SAP has helped with process optimization, with all data and reports in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Planning Analytics writes "Quick data analysis, reliable, AI improvement needed". Board is most compared with Tableau, CCH Tagetik, Qlik Sense, Anaplan and SAP Analytics Cloud, whereas IBM Planning Analytics is most compared with Microsoft BI, SAP Analytics Cloud, Tableau, Jedox and Oracle Analytics Cloud. See our Board vs. IBM Planning Analytics report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.