Compare Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Visual LANSA
Views
172
Comparisons
159
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
198
Comparisons
119
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Pega, Appian, Microsoft and others in Low-Code Development Platforms. Updated: February 2021.
465,891 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 100% of the time.
Boomi Flow
Boomi Flow is a modern, cloud-native service for creating customer journeys and automating simple and sophisticated workflows that accelerate your business outcomes.
The Visual LANSA low-code development platform enables software developers to build multi-experience applications spanning mobile, web and desktop in days instead of months.
Learn more about Boomi AtomSphere Flow
Learn more about Visual LANSA
bioventus, AM Transport Services
Elders Rural, Duro-Last, NSPCC, Japan Cash Machine (JCM)
Find out what your peers are saying about Pega, Appian, Microsoft and others in Low-Code Development Platforms. Updated: February 2021.
465,891 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Boomi AtomSphere Flow is ranked 27th in Low-Code Development Platforms while Visual LANSA is ranked 28th in Low-Code Development Platforms. Boomi AtomSphere Flow is rated 0.0, while Visual LANSA is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Boomi AtomSphere Flow is most compared with Camunda BPM, Pega BPM, Apache Airflow, Microsoft PowerApps and Amazon Step Functions, whereas Visual LANSA is most compared with OutSystems.
See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.