• Home
  • IBM Rational Focal Point vs. Micro Focus Caliber [EOL]

IBM Rational Focal Point vs Micro Focus Caliber [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Application Requirements Management
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Rational Focal Point and Micro Focus Caliber [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Requirements Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
14th
out of 17 in Application Requirements Management
Views
97
Comparisons
57
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Application Requirements Management
Buyer's Guide
Application Requirements Management
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Rational Focal Point
Borland Caliber
Learn More
IBM
OpenText
Overview
IBM Rational Focal Point is a comprehensive portfolio planning solution for market-driven teams. With Rational Focal Point, teams can make collaborative, objective decisions to deliver market, customer, and business value. By understanding what matters most, your organization can respond to dynamic market conditions and deliver valued products and projects.
Caliber (formerly Borland Caliber) is a complete requirements solution which ensures compliance and alignment of development to your business needs. Caliber facilitates stakeholder collaboration, rich visualization, robust management, and traceability of requirements to agile delivery plans. Deliver software with greater precision, less re-work, shorter release cycles, compliance with internal and external regulations, and improved customer satisfaction.
Sample Customers
SanDisk, CareCore National, Laminar Medica, Chubb Insurance, Swedbank
QinetiQ, Invertix Corporation, K.J. Ross & Associates, Siem Consub, Ministry of Defence _ France
Buyer's Guide
Application Requirements Management
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Rational Focal Point is ranked 14th in Application Requirements Management while Micro Focus Caliber [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Requirements Management. IBM Rational Focal Point is rated 0.0, while Micro Focus Caliber [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM Rational Focal Point is most compared with , whereas Micro Focus Caliber [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.