We performed a comparison between Broadcom Network Flow Analysis and Cisco Secure Network Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"It is an overall stable solution."
"This solution has helped our organization by allowing us to have visibility. We deal with cybersecurity, so visibility is very important."
"Being able to graph and show data to management has improved our organization. We can show the data to the higher-ups. It shows them that it's picking up on these anomalies and doing its job."
"Great network monitoring, looking at anomaly detection and evaluation."
"Ease of deployment, once you get your ducks in a row."
"The ability to send data flow from other places and have them all in one place is very valuable for us."
"The most valuable feature is having visibility into the data segments throughout our network."
"We find that Stealthwatch can detect the unseen."
"There are already many functionalities, so I don't think there is anything to improve."
"Cisco Stealthwatch has predefined alerts for different types of security issues that might happen in the network. Whether it's PCs or servers that are used for botnets or Bitcoin mining we receive the alerts automatically. This functionality is what we receive from the solution out of the box."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"Currently, Broadcom Network Flow Analysis does not support high-availability solutions, making it an area that needs improvement."
"I would like to see more security features, like a lost protection package."
"We need to be able to filter out internal IPs as non-threats."
"The initial setup was complex."
"It's too complicated to install, when starting out."
"We've had problems with element licensing costs so scalability is a concern."
"We are continuing down the road of ACI and ISE with Cisco, so we would like to see the continuation of Stealthwatch integrating into ISE for exchange of information, and also, more into the ACI environment too."
"Cisco could improve the administration for the customers."
"Stealthwatch needs improvement when it comes to speed."
"Complexity on integration is not so straightforward and you really need an expert to help build it out."
More Broadcom Network Flow Analysis Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Cisco Secure Network Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Broadcom Network Flow Analysis is ranked 65th in Network Monitoring Software with 6 reviews while Cisco Secure Network Analytics is ranked 24th in Network Monitoring Software with 57 reviews. Broadcom Network Flow Analysis is rated 8.4, while Cisco Secure Network Analytics is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Broadcom Network Flow Analysis writes "A stable tool that helps identify the complete flow analysis in a network". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Secure Network Analytics writes "Increased the visibility of what is happening in our network". Broadcom Network Flow Analysis is most compared with WatchTower Security Management App, Wireshark and SCOM, whereas Cisco Secure Network Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Cisco Secure Cloud Analytics, ThousandEyes, Vectra AI and Arista NDR. See our Broadcom Network Flow Analysis vs. Cisco Secure Network Analytics report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.