• Home
  • BusinessGenetics xBML vs. IBM System Architect

BusinessGenetics xBML vs IBM System Architect comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BusinessGenetics Logo
BusinessGenetics xBML
Read 1 BusinessGenetics xBML review
116 views|28 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
IBM System Architect
Read 1 IBM System Architect review
391 views|302 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Design
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BusinessGenetics xBML and IBM System Architect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Software AG and others in Business Process Design.
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Design Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Phumi Maduna-Ogbechi
Has built-in, existing processes that can be easily modified
Anonymous User
It has helped in supporting the development of an Enterprise Data Model
It has helped in supporting the development of an Enterprise Data Model.
Ranking
30th
out of 38 in Business Process Design
Views
116
Comparisons
28
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
21st
out of 38 in Business Process Design
Views
391
Comparisons
302
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Design
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Software AG and others in Business Process Design. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
xBML
System Architect
Learn More
BusinessGenetics
Video Not Available
IBM
Overview
BusinessGenetics xBML (extended Business Modelling Language) is an intuitive graphical language that unlocks the DNA of a corporation using a system of diagrams based on five Ws (Who; What; Which; Where; When). xBML gives companies an complete and accurate map of their enterprise, that can then be re-used repeatedly to describe, plan and create improvement.
IBM Rational System Architect is an enterprise architecture tool, that you can use to visualize, analyze, and communicate all aspects of an enterprise architecture by applying industry-standard frameworks, notations, and methods. After you capture and understand an architecture, you can plan and implement its future improvements intelligently.
Sample Customers
Qwest, Wachovia, Corporate Express, State of Colorado, Bank of America
Wuxi Lake Cloud, Nationwide, ETI, IDS Scheer
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Government22%
Manufacturing Company15%
Aerospace/Defense Firm8%
University6%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise3%
Large Enterprise75%
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Design
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Software AG and others in Business Process Design. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BusinessGenetics xBML is ranked 30th in Business Process Design while IBM System Architect is ranked 21st in Business Process Design. BusinessGenetics xBML is rated 8.0, while IBM System Architect is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of BusinessGenetics xBML writes "Has built-in, existing processes that can be easily modified". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM System Architect writes "It has helped in supporting the development of an Enterprise Data Model". BusinessGenetics xBML is most compared with , whereas IBM System Architect is most compared with Visual Paradigm, No Magic MagicDraw and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.