CA Application Test [EOL] vs Galen Framework comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo
views| comparisons
Galen Framework Logo
268 views|111 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Application Test [EOL] and Galen Framework based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use CA Application Test [EOL]?
Hashk Test
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:What I like most about Galen Framework are its advantages, particularly its spec language and the spec file feature.
Top Answer:Galen Framework does not have any additional costs after the product is purchased.
Top Answer:I haven't found any specific areas for modernization or improvement in Galen Framework yet. However, one observation I have made is about the auto-generation of Galen files. While this feature exists… more »
Ranking
Unranked
In Functional Testing Tools
24th
Views
268
Comparisons
111
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
376
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Learn More
Galen Framework
Video Not Available
Overview
CA Application Test automates QA and testing with a scriptless mobile device, composite app and API testing tool. It is a collaborative automated testing solution designed to test and validate modern Web and mobile applications along with the APIs, Web services and legacy backend protocols. The expansive protocol support means that actions taken to invoke a business process or rule from the UI or API can be validated in the implementing technology. It features a codeless testing framework that enables multiple cross-functional team members to design and execute automated unit, functional, regression, integration and performance tests covering modern through legacy technologies.

Layout testing seemed always a complex task. Galen Framework offers a simple solution: test location of objects relatively to each other on page. Using a special syntax and comprehensive rules you can describe any layout you can imagine.

Galen Framework runs well in Selenium Grid. You can set up your tests to run in a cloud like Sauce Labs or BrowserStack so that you can even test your responsive websites on different mobile devices. Galen can run multiple tests in parallel which is also a nice time saver.

Galen Framework is designed with responsivness in mind. It is easy to set up a test for different browser sizes. Galen just opens a browser, resizes it to a defined size and then tests the page according to specifications.

Sample Customers
Conway, T Mobile
Information Not Available
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm15%
Energy/Utilities Company12%
Computer Software Company12%
Healthcare Company10%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise78%
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA Application Test [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools while Galen Framework is ranked 24th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews. CA Application Test [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Galen Framework is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Galen Framework writes "Scalable with strong reporting capabilities". CA Application Test [EOL] is most compared with Bitbar, whereas Galen Framework is most compared with .

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.