CA eHealth [EOL] vs NetMaster Network Intelligence comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo
views| comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Broadcom Logo
118 views|76 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA eHealth [EOL] and NetMaster Network Intelligence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Broadcom and others in Network Management Applications.
To learn more, read our detailed Network Management Applications Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Ranking
Unranked
In Network Management Applications
Views
118
Comparisons
76
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Network Management Applications
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Broadcom and others in Network Management Applications. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
CA eHealth Performance Manager
CA NetMaster Network Management. CA NetMaster, CA NetMaster Network Management for TCP/IP, CA NetMaster Network Management for SNA, CA NetMaster Network Management for TCP/IP
Learn More
Overview
eHealth collects and analyzes key performance information (KPI) across your IT infrastructure to provide real-time and predictive performance analysis. This information can guide your staff toward the corrective actions needed to avoid negative impacts on business processes.

CA NetMaster Network Management for TCP/IP enables you to optimize your IP and EE network for business success, by providing reliable network access to IP-enabled mainframe applications while reducing your mainframe costs with integrated solution that enables you to proactively monitor, manage and remediate network problems. It also helps improve security awareness with advanced diagnostics such as real-time verification of secured and non-secured connections. 

Sample Customers
BlueCross Blue Shield of Tennessee, Devoteam, Fujitsu Australia and New Zealand , National Informatics Centre, Uttar Pradesh State Unit Lucknow, Punjab National Bank, Racing and Wagering Western Australia, Sicredi
Tieto
Buyer's Guide
Network Management Applications
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Broadcom and others in Network Management Applications. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA eHealth [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Management Applications while NetMaster Network Intelligence is ranked 23rd in Network Management Applications. CA eHealth [EOL] is rated 7.4, while NetMaster Network Intelligence is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of CA eHealth [EOL] writes "It has a lot of data on a stable platform. It only has a few canned out-of-the-box reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetMaster Network Intelligence writes "Streamlines quick and effective drill-down into the network stack for better troubleshooting". CA eHealth [EOL] is most compared with , whereas NetMaster Network Intelligence is most compared with .

See our list of best Network Management Applications vendors.

We monitor all Network Management Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.