CA eHealth [EOL] vs OpServices OpMon comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo
views| comparisons
75% willing to recommend
OpServices Logo
259 views|197 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA eHealth [EOL] and OpServices OpMon based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring.
To learn more, read our detailed IT Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Ranking
Unranked
In IT Infrastructure Monitoring
Views
259
Comparisons
197
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
CA eHealth Performance Manager
OpMon
Learn More
OpServices
Video Not Available
Overview
eHealth collects and analyzes key performance information (KPI) across your IT infrastructure to provide real-time and predictive performance analysis. This information can guide your staff toward the corrective actions needed to avoid negative impacts on business processes.
OpMon allows you to track, in real time, the performance of the business activities and their results. It generates reports of availability, capacity and performance, SLA, SLM, among others. Allows reduction in spending on skilled professionals and reduction in loss / hour derived from system failures.
Sample Customers
BlueCross Blue Shield of Tennessee, Devoteam, Fujitsu Australia and New Zealand , National Informatics Centre, Uttar Pradesh State Unit Lucknow, Punjab National Bank, Racing and Wagering Western Australia, Sicredi
Allianz, banco renner, AES Sul, Metalfrio Solutions, Mitsubishi Motors, Ciplan, Unimed, Portonave, Grupo Zaffari
Buyer's Guide
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA eHealth [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in IT Infrastructure Monitoring while OpServices OpMon is ranked 72nd in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. CA eHealth [EOL] is rated 7.4, while OpServices OpMon is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of CA eHealth [EOL] writes "It has a lot of data on a stable platform. It only has a few canned out-of-the-box reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpServices OpMon writes "​It offers a simple implementation of business and infrastructure dashboards but the monitoring services need improvement". CA eHealth [EOL] is most compared with NetMaster Network Intelligence, whereas OpServices OpMon is most compared with Zabbix and Dell CloudIQ.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.