CA NetMaster Network Automation [EOL] vs OpenText Network Operations Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA NetMaster Network Automation [EOL] and OpenText Network Operations Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Broadcom and others in Network Management Applications.
To learn more, read our detailed Network Management Applications Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Micro Focus' price is on the higher side, but there are other products like CA products and IBM that are more expensive. At the same time, you have to compare the maturity level of the solutions."
  • More OpenText Network Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Management Applications solutions are best for your needs.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:We can detect non-compliant devices and automate remediation actions to cover the gap in the configuration standards.
    Top Answer:For small/medium networks, I'd recommend SolarWinds, Manage Engine, or PRTG. For vendor-based situations, Cisco Prime is best. With large-scale and multi-vendor scalability and security in mind, Micro… more »
    Top Answer:The NOM Platform already covers multiple vendors, and a lot of device types. This range of vendors and devices is increasing every quarter It may need a more customizable UI, which has already started… more »
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Network Management Applications
    Views
    147
    Comparisons
    41
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    839
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus Network Operations Management
    Learn More
    Overview

    Provide reliable network access to IP-enabled mainframe applications while reducing your mainframe costs with integrated solution that enables you to proactively monitor, manage and remediate network problems. Improve security awareness with advanced diagnostics such as real-time verification of secured and non-secured connections.

    Network management solutions are continually called onto to adapt to new technologies, while retaining value of existing ones, including: SDNs, multiple connection methods to the cloud and Internet, remote sites, and WiFi networks. All of these technologies require closer collaboration between network engineering and operations because of their dynamic nature, which requires fast and deep understanding of the technologies to operate effectively.

    Sample Customers
    Tieto
    Information Not Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Network Management Applications
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Broadcom and others in Network Management Applications. Updated: April 2024.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA NetMaster Network Automation [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Management Applications while OpenText Network Operations Management is ranked 11th in Network Management Applications with 2 reviews. CA NetMaster Network Automation [EOL] is rated 0.0, while OpenText Network Operations Management is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Network Operations Management writes "Good integration capabilities, good reliability, and is user-friendly". CA NetMaster Network Automation [EOL] is most compared with , whereas OpenText Network Operations Management is most compared with .

    See our list of best Network Management Applications vendors.

    We monitor all Network Management Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.