• Home
  • CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] vs. NetIQ Identity Governance

CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] vs NetIQ Identity Governance comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] and NetIQ Identity Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM).
To learn more, read our detailed Privileged Access Management (PAM) Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
I like that the access control on the agent. Installation is difficult.
It gives us the ability to track who is using what ID and for what purpose.
Cassio-Silva
Stable, scalable, and affordable
NetIQ Identity Governance has improved the security of my company.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It's expensive relative to the cloud solutions that are out there."
  • "I give the cost a nine out of ten."
  • "In terms of pricing, the tool seems a bit cheaper compared to other SaaS solutions."

    • More NetIQ Identity Governance Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about NetIQ Identity Governance?
    Top Answer:You can run reports and verify the access each user has. There is a process that runs automatically for access review. It sends an email to the manager and provides a task for the manager to review… more »
    Read all 8 answers   →
    What needs improvement with NetIQ Identity Governance?
    Top Answer:NetIQ Identity Governance is not flexible. Sometimes, filtering information to provide users with options, such as selecting the application to which they want to request access, can be challenging… more »
    Read all 8 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for NetIQ Identity Governance?
    Top Answer:I use NetIQ Identity Governance to certify access.
    Read all 5 answers   →
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Privileged Access Management (PAM)
    22nd
    out of 78 in Identity Management (IM)
    Views
    484
    Comparisons
    185
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    428
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA Access Control, CA Privileged Identity Manager
    NetIQ Access Governance Suite, Novell Access Governance Suite
    Learn More
    Broadcom
    OpenText
    Overview
    CA Access Control provides tools to protect your system in both ways against unauthorized use of computer resources: block unauthorized users from accessing the system and block authorized users from accessing items to which they should not have access. CA Access Control also provides auditing tools that let you trace users' activities to track attempted misuse of the computer system.

    NetIQ Identity Governance is a solution that helps any organization run effective access certification campaigns and implement identity governance controls to meet compliance mandates while proactively mitigating risk. Built to get organizations up and running in hours vs the weeks or months of traditional legacy vendors, NetIQ Identity Governance replaces errorprone, time consuming manual methods that can expose your organization to compliance violations and risk from excessive access.

    Sample Customers
    Colruyt Group, Logicalis, TIS Inc.
    Western & Southern Financial Group
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company28%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise44%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business100%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    Privileged Access Management (PAM)
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Privileged Access Management (PAM) while NetIQ Identity Governance is ranked 22nd in Identity Management (IM) with 9 reviews. CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] is rated 7.8, while NetIQ Identity Governance is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] writes "I like that the access control on the agent. Installation is difficult". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetIQ Identity Governance writes "Helps to run reports and verify user access but improvement is needed in integration ". CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] is most compared with , whereas NetIQ Identity Governance is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, OpenText Identity and Access Management and One Identity Manager.

    We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.