We performed a comparison between Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and Cisco Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is easy to deploy, and it is not that complicated. There are a lot of systems that are very complicated, and they require a special kind of training. Their response is also very slow, especially with the Chinese vendors, but with Cambium, we have not faced any issues. Everything is going well in terms of cooperation from Cambium. We are happy with them, their services, their cooperation, and their quick response. They are just amazing."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is scalable. The XV2 model of the solution can support up to 216 people at a time."
"It's a good product and works well when there is a lot of interference."
"The initial setup is easy to handle. It's quite simple."
"The solution's coverage range is good, it is easy to use, and deployment is very easy and user-friendly."
"It eliminates the need for additional controllers, reducing costs."
"It excels in challenging environments and adverse weather conditions, maintaining high performance without any impact on the link quality."
"The performance is very good."
"We don't see many troubleshooting issues. Normally, it's a user error when it comes to the JSS or the VPN. Once they log into the system or they get on the internet, then they log directly into the JSS, so they can do their work."
"The ease of management is the solution's most valuable feature."
"The most valuable features are CleanAir, Rogue Detection, and the auto-calculation of RF."
"Our most valuable feature involves the 802.11ac, which operates at a very high level and has updated technology."
"The most valuable features of Cisco Wireless WAN are its security functionality. We have a lab environment and we have to provide different authentications to the users which are easy to manage. Additionally, there is a lot of useful automation embedded into the system."
"I also like that now you can add a cellular connection to the Cisco router. So, if your operator is down, you can now still have one connection in the office with the cellular module."
"Our university has experienced a positive return on investment, and I believe Cisco Wireless WAN will continue to benefit us for at least a decade."
"We used everything Cisco, not just wireless. It works great with other Cisco tools."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN could improve by providing a better signal range."
"The solution's price could be better."
"There is no good technical support available for Cambium Networks Wireless WAN."
"The installation is difficult."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN's support services could be better."
"There is room for improvement in the support."
"Sometimes there are some latencies in devices. Otherwise, it is, for some time, not as stable."
"They could enhance the product's security features, particularly in analyzing and protecting against potential threats."
"I hope Cisco can improve the capacity to service a high density of users in a small area, as currently we have difficulties with this."
"The cloud interoperability needs improvement."
"The DNA space is a separate license cost, which should be included in the license."
"The only disadvantage of Cisco is maybe the cost."
"Cisco Firewall cannot recognize some applications and that makes dealing with policies difficult. Even when we whitelist, it does not work well."
"The price of Cisco Wireless WAN could improve, it is expensive."
"Cisco Wireless WAN would be improved with the ability to monitor new usernames, product registrations, and flow traffic."
"Documentation is an area that needs review. It should be more dynamic and it should be easier."
More Cambium Networks Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 3rd in Wireless WAN with 23 reviews while Cisco Wireless WAN is ranked 4th in Wireless WAN with 61 reviews. Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.6, while Cisco Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN writes "Provides point-to-point and point-to-multipoint connectivity and user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Wireless WAN writes "It's a reliable, user-friendly solution". Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Ruckus Wireless WAN and Aruba Networks Wireless WAN, whereas Cisco Wireless WAN is most compared with Fortinet FortiExtender and Ubiquiti Wireless. See our Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs. Cisco Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.