Carbonite Migrate vs RISC Networks CloudScape [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
555 views|238 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Flexera Logo
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Carbonite Migrate and RISC Networks CloudScape [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Zerto, IBM and others in Cloud Migration.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Migration Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Carbonite Migrate is helpful on an infrastructure level.""Carbonite Migrate works well in Windows platform migrations and in the case of a VML platform. The migration is smooth in Windows environments."

More Carbonite Migrate Pros →

"The valuable feature of RISC Networks would be detecting application stack dependencies. If there are applications spread across front servers, it has a way of writing the data.""It gives us extra visibility that we didn't already have around how our applications are integrated with one another."

More RISC Networks CloudScape [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"Migration in RHEL and Linux environments can be improved. During RHEL migration with multiple data areas, you have to create a similar source environment at the destination. This can be challenging because you have to install it, create the VM, install over it, and mount it at the mount point. Only then can you do the migration.""We find it very difficult to use these tools in a multi-cloud environment"

More Carbonite Migrate Cons →

"It seemed to take a relatively long time to implement. I thought it would be quicker. Also, the initial deployment and installation does require skilled resources.""The major issue that I had with this product is that it is not instrumenting. Hence, I can't do a very deep level application inspection."

More RISC Networks CloudScape [EOL] Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing costs are really high."
  • "In terms of pricing, I think it's an expensive tool."
  • More Carbonite Migrate Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is expensive, but we can justify it. It would definitely be an expensive option in night time to run it continually. We decided to make a purchase just to help us with this migration. However, in the long-term, I don't know if we'll use it because of the cost."
  • "This product would provide better ROI for larger environments."
  • More RISC Networks CloudScape [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Friends, AWS gives comprehensive list of tools with filters.  Migration tools (amazon.com) 
    Ranking
    16th
    out of 38 in Cloud Migration
    Views
    555
    Comparisons
    238
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Unranked
    In Cloud Migration
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Migration
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Zerto, IBM and others in Cloud Migration. Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CloudScape
    Learn More
    Overview

    Carbonite Migrate allows you to easily migrate physical, virtual and cloud workloads to and from any environment with minimal risk and near-zero downtime. Options for finely tuned automation help orchestrate every stage of the process.

    Successful migrations to cloud require proper planning and analysis to determine the right applications to move, the right cloud provider, the best pricing model and much more. Whether you're considering public cloud, private or hybrid, CloudScape has you covered.

    Sample Customers
    Computrade Malaysia
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Government13%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Real Estate/Law Firm5%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise57%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Migration
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Zerto, IBM and others in Cloud Migration. Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Carbonite Migrate is ranked 16th in Cloud Migration while RISC Networks CloudScape [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Cloud Migration. Carbonite Migrate is rated 7.0, while RISC Networks CloudScape [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Carbonite Migrate writes "Great tool for one-to-one migration, but not suitable for multi-cloud migration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RISC Networks CloudScape [EOL] writes "From a portfolio perspective, it has allowed us to validate what servers and applications we have". Carbonite Migrate is most compared with Nutanix Move, AWS Migration Hub, Oracle Zero Downtime Migration and AWS Application Migration Service, whereas RISC Networks CloudScape [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Cloud Migration vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.