• Home
  • IBM eDiscovery Manager vs. OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations

IBM eDiscovery Manager vs OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM eDiscovery Manager and OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery.
To learn more, read our detailed eDiscovery Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ivan Castaneda
Stable with administrative aspects and an easy to navigate backend
Use OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations?
Ranking
25th
out of 40 in eDiscovery
Views
116
Comparisons
53
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
18th
out of 40 in eDiscovery
Views
209
Comparisons
114
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
eDiscovery Manager
Catalyst e-Discovery
Learn More
IBM
OpenText
Overview
IBM eDiscovery Manager enables authorized IT and legal staff to search, cull, hold and export case-relevant content to manage electronically stored information (ESI). eDiscovery Manager helps you respond to discovery requests and Streamlines and standardizes the electronic discovery process. It Preserves the electronically stored information (ESI) evidence in a security-rich, auditable, high-scale, trusted evidence repository that includes chain-of-custody tracking and Enhances your capacity to organize ESI, email and other content to reduce discovery costs and risks.
Catalyst's E-discovery cloud platform provides an integrated repository for the heart of the litigation lifecycle - from processing through search, analytics, review and production. It provides a smarter way to manage cases, investigations and regulatory requests using the Catalyst's central, single- instance document repository. It provides an Automated Redaction that will assist reviewers in eliminating privileged and confidential information from case files and it reduces the need for reviewers to manually scour documents and tediously block-redact individual portions.
Sample Customers
Hansgrohe
Major CERCLA lawsuit
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM eDiscovery Manager is ranked 25th in eDiscovery while OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations is ranked 18th in eDiscovery. IBM eDiscovery Manager is rated 9.0, while OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM eDiscovery Manager writes "Stable with administrative aspects and an easy to navigate backend". On the other hand, IBM eDiscovery Manager is most compared with , whereas OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations is most compared with .

See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.