We compared Check Point Antivirus and Microsoft Exchange Online Protection based on users' reviews in six categories. We reviewed all of the data, and you can find the conclusion below.
Features: Check Point Antivirus impressed users with its diverse set of valuable features like sandboxing, real-time detection, and integration with analytics solutions and the cloud. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection offers seamless integration with Windows, a central alert console, and real-time monitoring of suspicious URLs.
Room for Improvement: Check Point Antivirus requires quicker customer assistance, better performance of the graphical user interface, enhanced defense against zero-day attacks, and more budget-friendly pricing options. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection could offer more training and enhance its security features. Users also requested better encryption, gray email management, and integration with non-Microsoft platforms.
Ease of Deployment: Some users found Check Point’s setup process to be uncomplicated and fast, while others noted that it required several engineers and took around a week to finish. Users had varied experiences setting up Microsoft Exchange Online Protection, ranging from easy to difficult. It may necessitate dedicated personnel for maintenance.
Service and Support: User reviews have provided no information about the customer service of Check Point Antivirus so far. While some users found Microsoft support to be helpful and responsive, others experienced slower response times.
Pricing: The price of Check Point Antivirus may vary depending on partnerships and negotiations. Some users consider Check Point's pricing to be expensive but say it is cost-effective. However, it may not be affordable for small or medium-sized companies unless they have sufficient capital. Some users said Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is expensive, but others considered it reasonable.
ROI: Check Point Antivirus provides added features like a sandbox and VPN licenses, enhancing its value. Users have experienced improved protection and promising growth with Check Point Antivirus, delivering a better ROI than other security options. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection has proven to be a profitable investment.
Comparison Results: Check Point Antivirus offers advanced features like sandboxing, real-time detection, and scalability. At the same time, some users say Check Point could be more affordable and improve its GUI performance. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is praised for its seamless integration with Windows and useful features like URL holding and threat management, but users say it could improve in areas such as pricing, documentation, and security features.
"What I like best about Check Point Antivirus is that it's a strong tool for preventing malicious traffic and threats from entering the environment."
"It is a great, cost-effective, and stable security solution to opt for."
"What I like best about Check Point Antivirus is that it's a good solution against phishing, malware, etc. It can do a lot in terms of security. You can also manage all the endpoints or users from the Check Point Antivirus platform, which is another feature I found valuable in the solution."
"A very good and robust antivirus solution."
"It is very easy to manage the Antivirus blade, even for newcomers in our technical support team, which is a key area of interest for us."
"The tool comes with an in-built AI feature, which makes file management easier. It also secures the network from viruses, malware, and phishing attacks."
"Check Point Antivirus is a cost-effective security solution for businesses and that's why its acceptability by various other fields and organizations is humongous."
"It has significantly bolstered our overall cybersecurity posture."
"The scalability is pretty good; it does what it is supposed to do."
"The initial setup was easy. The configuration process is very straightforward."
"In general, my company is happy with Microsoft support...My company hasn't faced any stability issues with the solution."
"The pre-set policies and configuration analyzer are the most valuable features."
"The product's most valuable feature is third-party integrations."
"It's all running in the backend, so it doesn't affect the app functionality."
"With Microsoft Exchange Online Protection, if malware is attached to a mailer, it's very easy to go into the incident alert and find out what's happening with that identity and the mail."
"Microsoft EOP's most valuable feature is a shared mailbox."
"What's missing in Check Point Antivirus is the EDL feature."
"They can improve the customization features to the greatest extent possible and also help bring automation into system security in the most unified manner possible."
"I would like to be able to see this integration of device analysis and verification - not just in native-integrated solutions - for Linux and iOS mobile devices, which are today a part of the larger group of devices and solutions that we have available."
"The next release can focus more on timely upgrades to enhance computing compatibility."
"The pricing is really extremely high in comparison to the rest of the market."
"The automatic updates use my internet during downloads before I authorize them."
"I would like to see them implement a system that would enable us to do certain things from our mobile like applying policies, opening up and blocking ports, and restricting connection. It is because IT personnel are not always around on the premises. We can instantly do these things from our mobile. They should also consider the price so that many people will go for the solution."
"The technical support could be improved."
"The tool is not 100% stable."
"Microsoft 365 Defender and EOP policies are stable with the proper license. However, with the basic policy, it's hard to say it's stable due to configuration limitations."
"The price of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection could be reduced to make it more competitive."
"The product could be more stable. Microsoft products could be more stable because sometimes, even though they are updating some things, we cannot find those updates."
"The solution must improve the user experience."
"The licensing can be on the expensive side, especially in the cloud space."
"They should specify the difference between Defender for Office 365 and Exchange Online Protection."
"When you're using a Microsoft product solution, you can scale it, but if you're not, there are limitations."
More Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Antivirus is ranked 6th in Anti-Malware Tools with 49 reviews while Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) is ranked 10th in Anti-Malware Tools with 34 reviews. Check Point Antivirus is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Check Point Antivirus writes "Compatible, cost-effective, and highly customizable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) writes "An effective email security solution that provides DLP, Safe Attachment, and Safe Links". Check Point Antivirus is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform, VirusTotal and ZoneAlarm, whereas Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Proofpoint Email Protection, Cisco Secure Email, Mimecast Email Security and Fortinet FortiMail. See our Check Point Antivirus vs. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) report.
See our list of best Anti-Malware Tools vendors.
We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.