We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP and Netskope based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management."I can take proactive actions based on an alert without having to interact with the platform directly."
"The CloudGuard for Cloud Intelligence tool has several significant features that provide security to our company."
"The solution offers an excellent price, benefit, and installation relationship."
"Compliance is becoming an important tool for us as well."
"The system has deployed security tools to enhance effective investigations in the entire company networking system."
"On Dome9, you can have reports on compliance, users created, and EAM access to the cloud infrastructure. For example, if some machine is exposed to the Internet, importing and exporting to the Internet when it shouldn't, we get immediate alerts if someone does this type of configuration by mistake. Dome9 is very important because AWS doesn't protect us for this. It is the client's responsibility to make sure that we don't export things to the Internet. This solution helps us ensure that we comply with our security measures."
"The most valuable feature of Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is the training."
"The rulesets and the findings are valuable. The actual core functionality of it and the efficacy of events are great."
"They are very good at CASB as compared to other players."
"I have found the most useful features to be the Web Secure Gateway, CASB, infrastructural service scanning, and Zero Trust."
"A very straightforward interface."
"Their technical support is very good."
"The solution offers a better understanding of the real scenario and identifies the cloud apps that are being utilized."
"Netskope is a really good product. I cannot segregate which features are the most valuable. We find most of the features to be valuable. It gives us what we are looking for."
"The automation offered by the product is pretty solid."
"Technical support is good. They are very helpful and quick to resolve any issues we have."
"The tool should incorporate more use cases like improving security scores. It should also improve documentation."
"Timely updates and upgrades to meet modern technological changes could help improve performance and limit the chances of downtime."
"Check Point must provide a multi-cloud facility where AWS, Azure, and GCP can seamlessly work together and display posture in an integrated manner."
"We're looking for a solution that can incorporate legacy infrastructure for some of our business needs."
"Addressing the large amount of compliance information and benchmarks we need to observe, the tools are becoming our goto dashboards."
"In Dome9, there should be a policy validation option where we can validate the policy before we push it into production."
"Adding a feature that allows me to easily identify the changes that have been made to the CIS benchmark and update my own policy accordingly would be a valuable addition to Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management."
"The license cost is expensive and has room for improvement."
"There could be room for improvement in the subscription process."
"It needed some fine-tuning on core business sites that we used, which were sensitive to what we term a man-in-the-middle certificate by design. Some sites were not tolerant because they presented as potentially malicious. So, we just had to make some tweaks so that it would bypass or interpret it."
"The solution's documentation still needs to be improved."
"The solution's implementations can be made much easier because, currently, it is complex in nature."
"Compatibility with other proxy polars would be helpful."
"The configuration in the cloud model could be improved upon."
"I would like to have an identity theft protection function."
"Support services could definitely be improved. Support is the one area that can always use improvement. It's an evolving thing, so based on demand and based on market requirement and the way market is moving towards."
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 5th in Vulnerability Management with 60 reviews while Netskope is ranked 4th in Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) with 35 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.6, while Netskope is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Netskope writes "Network proxy that provides visibility during deployment and allows you to control PII". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS GuardDuty, Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Qualys VMDR, whereas Netskope is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Cisco Umbrella and Skyhigh Security.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.