Compare Check Point CloudGuard SaaS vs. Guardicore Centra

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard SaaS vs. Guardicore Centra and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
442,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The automated rule cleanups and automated policy installs have improved my customers' organizations.""The API is its most valuable feature. On the API side, relative to the rest of the market, Check Point is decades ahead of its competitors.""The main benefit is that hackers can't steal information.""Check Point adds value with east-west protection in the data center.""It seems quite scalable. We don't anticipate any scaling issues. We have it deployed in the cloud.""The most valuable features would be its ability to intercept phishing emails and emails laden with malware, viruses, false links, etc.""The program has a nice interface and it is easy to use.""The feature I find to be most valuable is very much the zero-touch provisioning. I was able to be up, operational, and 100 percent functional in less than a half an hour."

More Check Point CloudGuard SaaS Pros »

"That is primarily because I've seen increased rules. It's kind of caught us a little off guard. With GuardiCore, I have had to deal with their technical support and engineering team in Israel. They are amazing. They are very quick to adapt.""The solution is very scalable, especially when connected to the cloud resources.""Its deception features are great, providing a rich telemetry of lured origins, and are a great resource for any active defense strategy.""This tool greatly helps in understanding the footprint of the attacks.""The interface and dashboard are amazing."

More Guardicore Centra Pros »

Cons
"I have learned enough to make the product stable. However, the stability has some challenges.""I would love it if they would do some work on the Postgres definition on the back-end.""We have used technical support, but their response time is very slow. It needs to be improved.""There is always room for improvement and growth.""Stability has been a pain point. I was going back and forth with my product engineer and project manager for a couple of months. I had the product in a demonstration mode and wasn't satisfied with the results initially. After a few alterations and a few revisions later, it is fine.""At this time, the two-factor authentication does not work for Active Directory.""if a phishing email were to get through and bypass the product — which very few do — it would be nice if, when a user clicked on that phishing email, they got a second-chance opportunity, a chance to double-check that they really wanted to proceed to that website.""We still get some false positives. There are times when legitimate stuff gets flagged and it could be that somebody is expecting a very important email but they don't end up getting it. On the flip side, when we alert Check Point about stuff like this, it is corrected, so they are improving. That's a plus."

More Check Point CloudGuard SaaS Cons »

"Clients would like to see that the security policies of GuardiCore can continue to be comparable to all the major firewall players out there.""The dashboard needs improvement. It should be more flexible so that I can easily see what I want or need to see.""Needs more customization of honeypots and a vaster catalog of systems able to be mimicked.""The product needs a few features like enhanced user policies and payload-level inspection to improve the offering."

More Guardicore Centra Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Having information stolen by a hacker would be more expensive than purchasing a license.""Being able to keep the phishing campaigns out of my company has been ROI for me.""Do a full feature evaluation (interactive) with a support person. That is what I did.""The price is very good, based on what they deliver.""One of the nice features is that the licensing model is elastic, so if you go over your license count, you can add users during your billing cycle and true-up later.""There are absolutely no additional costs to the standard licensing fees. One of the wonderful pieces is that CloudGuard SaaS is all-inclusive in its licensing. There's no a-la-carte functionality. You're getting 100 percent of the product for the licensing that you're paying.""The difference between [Check Point and its competitors] boiled down to money. Price-wise, Check Point was very good, it was very competitive."

More Check Point CloudGuard SaaS Pricing and Cost Advice »

"GuardiCore has made some new changes to the license now. We've seen monthly and annual licenses based on a subscription. We have a few clients that pay anywhere from $25,000 a year."

More Guardicore Centra Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Workload Security solutions are best for your needs.
442,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The feature I find to be most valuable is very much the zero-touch provisioning. I was able to be up, operational, and 100 percent functional in less than a half an hour.
Top Answer: It's hard to advise people on pricing and licensing. It's priced per user, although I do not remember what the list-price per user is and I don't even remember what we pay per user. But Check Point… more »
Top Answer: One of the areas that I would like to see them develop into the product would be in the user feedback arena. Today, if a phishing email were to get through and bypass the product — which very few do —… more »
Top Answer: Its deception features are great, providing a rich telemetry of lured origins, and are a great resource for any active defense strategy.
Top Answer: Needs more customization of honeypots and a vaster catalog of systems able to be mimicked. The netflow analytics (ML) focused in threat detection needs to be enhanced to provide more practical forms… more »
Top Answer: This solution will be implemented in several environments for our collaborators.
Ranking
5th
Views
2,758
Comparisons
1,547
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
620
Avg. Rating
8.6
6th
Views
6,658
Comparisons
4,497
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
789
Avg. Rating
9.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 39% of the time.
Compared 30% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Also Known As
Check Point CloudGuardGuardiCore
Learn
Check Point
Guardicore
Overview

From private cloud datacenters to public clouds and SaaS applications, CloudGuard provides comprehensive cloud security solutions to keep enterprise data, assets and apps free from even the most sophisticated attacks.
Learn more about Check Point Cloud Security.

Guardicore Centra is a comprehensive data center and cloud security solution that delivers the simplest way to apply micro-segmentation controls to reduce the attack surface and detect and control breaches within east-west traffic. It provides deep visibility into application dependencies and enforces network and process-level policies to protect critical applications.

Offer
Learn more about Check Point CloudGuard SaaS
Learn more about Guardicore Centra
Sample Customers
Helvetia, Denham Capital, Daymark Solutions, Neopharm GroupSantander, Frontier Airlines, OpenLink, Intermountain Healthcare, Cellcom, BancoBASE
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company45%
Financial Services Firm18%
Government9%
Insurance Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider19%
Media Company8%
Construction Company4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider16%
Insurance Company6%
Manufacturing Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise50%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard SaaS vs. Guardicore Centra and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
442,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Check Point CloudGuard SaaS is ranked 5th in Cloud Workload Security with 8 reviews while Guardicore Centra is ranked 6th in Cloud Workload Security with 4 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard SaaS is rated 8.6, while Guardicore Centra is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard SaaS writes "Daily phishing attacks are no longer negatively impacting us, and we no longer have data exfiltration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Guardicore Centra writes "The efficiency of the security team was improved by over 100% in terms of analytics, monitoring, and responding to incidents". Check Point CloudGuard SaaS is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Dome9, Cisco Tetration and Symantec Cloud Workload Protection, whereas Guardicore Centra is most compared with Cisco Tetration, Illumio Adaptive Security Platform, VMware NSX, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Darktrace. See our Check Point CloudGuard SaaS vs. Guardicore Centra report.

See our list of best Cloud Workload Security vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Workload Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.