We performed a comparison between Check Point easy2Comply [EOL] and IBM OpenPages based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, IBM, MetricStream and others in IT Governance."It has very specific features which allow us to generate or see recommendations."
"The tool has very good characteristics that can help us evaluate an entire infrastructure and get the most out of it."
"The product’s interface is very intuitive."
"The content, reporting, and workflow features stand out as the most valuable aspects."
"The ability to keep a record of internal incidents in the company, and also the monitoring of Key Indicators."
"They could add real-time monitoring to improve the visibility of the entire infrastructure and improve the product a little more in terms of cloud integration."
"The solution should be easier to use when it comes to entering and configuring with the internal applications."
"I believe there's room for improvement in establishing connections with external information."
"IBM OpenPages needs improvement in its UI. Currently, it is difficult to see the relationships (associations/parents) between all items unless you click on the item itself."
"The solution must allow customization in reporting."
Earn 20 points
Check Point easy2Comply [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in IT Governance with 2 reviews while IBM OpenPages is ranked 2nd in IT Governance with 5 reviews. Check Point easy2Comply [EOL] is rated 6.0, while IBM OpenPages is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Check Point easy2Comply [EOL] writes "Great for compliance with good reporting and reliability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM OpenPages writes "Enables us to manage global workflow and users' relationships with the links". Check Point easy2Comply [EOL] is most compared with , whereas IBM OpenPages is most compared with RSA Archer, MetricStream, OneTrust GRC, SAP BusinessObjects GRC and AuditBoard.
See our list of best IT Governance vendors.
We monitor all IT Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
