Over 259,791 professionals have used IT Central Station research.
Compare the best IT Governance vendors based on product reviews, ratings, and comparisons.
All reviews and ratings are from real users, validated by our triple authentication process.
The total ranking of a product, represented by the bar length, is based on a weighted aggregate score.
The score is calculated as follows: The product with the highest count in each area gets the highest available score.
(20 points for Reviews; 16 points for Views, Comparisons, and Followers.)
Every other product gets assigned points based on its total in proportion to the #1 product in
that area. For example, if a product has 80% of the number of reviews compared to the product
with the most reviews then the product's score for reviews would be 20% (weighting factor) *
80% = 16. For Average Rating, the maximum score is 32 points awarded linearly based on our
rating scale of 1-10. If a product has fewer than ten reviews, the point contribution
for Average Rating is reduced (one-third reduction in points for products with 5-9 reviews;
two-thirds reduction for products with fewer than five reviews). Reviews that are more than 24 months old,
as well as those written by resellers, are completely excluded from the ranking algorithm.
We have used Rsam's out-of-the-box modules for: * Vendor Risk Management * Application Assessments * Vulnerability Management * Control Testing * Incident Response * Policy Management We have also built our own modules using their slick... more»
We have far more visibility into our compliance, risks and controls, etc. over the areas we are managing vs accepting risk. Rsam has also been extremely helpful with the annual audits we receive from our regulators. We used another tool... more»
With OpenPages, the risks and controls are registered and monitored continuously. Furthermore, there is an audit trail function where we are able to see the changes to the items from the time we registered the item. Another useful feature is... more»
IBM OpenPages needs improvement in its UI. Currently, it is difficult to see the relationships and then only they are able to create an incident. After that the issue associated with the incident also needs to be updated. KIs, while useful,... more»
We used to use Archer, and switched to Rsam. In one year we were able to accomplish what we could not in our 3 year Archer contract. And we did it with 1/2 the consulting services and 1/3 the administrators. On a personal note, my team was... more»
IT Architect at a logistics company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Mar 13 2018
What do you think of Nexthink?
Primary Use Case
Security and compliancy management Global CA 5000 workstations in 30 countries with multiple IT organizations.
• Improvements to My Organization
Preventive maintenance of end user devices. Number of service incidents dropped by more than 20%.
• Valuable Features
Repository of events. Although limited to 100,000,000 events per engine, it is suffice to do investigations for more than 30 days.
• Room for Improvement
Go into IoT (mostly Linux based). At this moment, it is only Windows and mobile (Android and iOS). It lacks support for IoT and most network equipment.
• Use of Solution
Less than one year.