We performed a comparison between Check Point Infinity and Trellix Network Detection and Response based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have full control over what our employees can do with the devices we provide them, to provide a secure and reliable network infrastructure."
"The detection and reaction rates are good."
"Check Point Infinity's threat prevention capabilities benefitted our organization."
"The solution is very stable. I would estimate it's 99.9% stable, if not more."
"The Check Point Infinity security architecture enables organizations to fully implement all of the Zero Trust Principles."
"The most valuable features of the solution stem from factors like ease of use, visibility, and cost to the enterprise."
"A notable aspect that I appreciate is their ongoing effort to redesign the portal, giving it a fresh and centralized appearance."
"The product, a cloud-based unified security solution, facilitates the automation of security threat detection and vulnerability management across various endpoints, including mobile and IoT devices. A notable feature is the centralized administration, allowing monitoring of existing solutions from web and mobile devices in a unified interface."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from how it allows users to do the investigation part. Another important part of the product that is valuable is associated with how it gives information to users in the form of a storyline."
"The product is very easy to configure."
"Support is very helpful and responsive."
"Its ability to find zero-day threats, malware and anything malicious has greatly improved my customer's organization, especially for protecting the users' browser."
"I also like its logging method. Its logging is very powerful and useful for forensic purposes. You can see the traffic or a specific activity or how something entered your network and where it went."
"Application categorization is the most valuable feature for us. Application filtering is very interesting because other products don't give you full application filtering capabilities."
"We see ROI in the sense that we don't have to react because it stops anything from hurting the network. We can stop it before we have a bigger mess to clean up."
"Improved our systems and our customers' by providing better malware protection, defense against zero-day threats, and improved network security."
"Check Point Infinity price could improve."
"We have had some performance issues. Because of this, we had to redirect traffic to be analyzed by other appliances."
"The console at the beginning also has the section on where to save the logs, however, if by mistake we choose a very remote area, this detail cannot be corrected unless the change of data center where the logs are housed, which is requested through support, which can become a management difficulty."
"The updates could be less frequent."
"Alert fatigue is a common issue with platforms that have strong detection capabilities. Implementing more filtering and prioritization mechanisms can help address this issue, ensuring that security teams can focus on the most critical threats."
"We need improvement around the Smart-1 cloud solution."
"It seems that the performance varies, likely influenced by the client's size and the provisioning of resources."
"The management console has given us some trouble, and the documentation is a little bit rigid in its solution paths."
"The problem with FireEye is that they don't allow VM or sandbox customization. The user doesn't have control of the VMs that are inside the box. It comes from the vendor as-is. Some users like to have control of it. Like what type of Windows and what type of applications and they have zero control over this."
"Stability issues manifested in terms of throughput maximization."
"It would be great if we could create granular reports based on the protocols, types of attacks, regions of attack, etc. Also we would like to easily be able to add exceptions to rules in cases of false positives."
"It is an expensive solution."
"If you want to search the hashes in the environment, you need to put in IOCs one by one, making it a very hectic job."
"A better depth of view, being able to see deeper into the management process, is what I'd like to see."
"Management of the appliance could be greatly improved."
"It is very expensive, the price could be better."
More Trellix Network Detection and Response Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Infinity is ranked 14th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 25 reviews while Trellix Network Detection and Response is ranked 9th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 37 reviews. Check Point Infinity is rated 8.8, while Trellix Network Detection and Response is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Check Point Infinity writes "Provides robust cybersecurity with a comprehensive suite of features, expert support, and scalable cloud-based architecture, ensuring effective threat detection and continuous improvement ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Network Detection and Response writes "Offers in-depth investigation capabilities, integrates well and smoothly transitioned from a lower-capacity appliance to a higher one". Check Point Infinity is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Cisco Secure Network Analytics, Skybox Security Suite, Proofpoint Email Protection and Microsoft Defender for Office 365, whereas Trellix Network Detection and Response is most compared with Fortinet FortiSandbox, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Zscaler Internet Access, Fortinet FortiGate and Vectra AI. See our Check Point Infinity vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response report.
See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
