We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare CircleCI vs. Oracle Hudson CI

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CircleCI Logo
2,057 views|1,879 comparisons
Oracle Hudson CI Logo
115 views|92 comparisons
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The price of CircleCI could be less expensive."

More CircleCI Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
552,027 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The automation workflow in CircleCI related to third-party applications is very good and allows standardization of applications.
Top Answer: The price of CircleCI could be less expensive.
Top Answer: There needs to be some improvement in the user interface of CircleCI.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
11th
out of 32 in Build Automation
Views
2,057
Comparisons
1,879
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
131
Rating
8.0
24th
out of 32 in Build Automation
Views
115
Comparisons
92
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Hudson CI
Learn More
Overview
CircleCI's continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. CircleCI offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp quickly, scale easily, and build confidently every day.

Hudson monitors the execution of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron. Among those things, currently Hudson focuses on the following two jobs:

  • Building/testing software projects continuously, just like CruiseControl or DamageControl. In a nutshell, Hudson provides an easy-to-use so-called continuous integration system, making it easier for developers to integrate changes to the project, and making it easier for users to obtain a fresh build. The automated, continuous build increases productivity.
  • Monitoring executions of externally-run jobs, such as cron jobs and procmail jobs, even those that are run on a remote machine. For example, with cron, all you receive is regular e-mails that capture the output, and it is up to you to look at them diligently and notice when it broke. Hudson keeps those outputs and makes it easy for you to notice when something is wrong.
Offer
Learn more about CircleCI
Learn more about Oracle Hudson CI
Sample Customers
Shopify, Zenefits, Concur Technologies, CyberAgent
Virgin Media
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider22%
Retailer6%
Financial Services Firm6%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: October 2021.
552,027 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CircleCI is ranked 11th in Build Automation with 1 review while Oracle Hudson CI is ranked 24th in Build Automation. CircleCI is rated 8.0, while Oracle Hudson CI is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of CircleCI writes "Beneficial automation workflow and valuable application standardization". On the other hand, CircleCI is most compared with Harness, AWS CodePipeline, Tekton, GoCD and Drone, whereas Oracle Hudson CI is most compared with Jenkins.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.