CircleCI vs JFrog Pipeline comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CircleCI Logo
1,878 views|1,711 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
JFrog Logo
303 views|280 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CircleCI and JFrog Pipeline based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The ability to automate the build process in a seamless way and run workflows effortlessly. It supports parallel builds so it can scale well. Also, it covers the basics of any build and integration tool, including email notifications (especially when tests are fixed), project insights, etc.""Enables us to detect exactly which build failed and why, and to push multiple builds to our production environment at a very fast rate.""Some of the most valuable features include container-based builds, integration with Bit Bucket and being able to store artifacts.""The solution offers continuous integration and continuous delivery.""It's a stable product.""The automation workflow in CircleCI related to third-party applications is very good and allows standardization of applications."

More CircleCI Pros →

"The platform has some amazing features and the integration option makes it very simple to plug with any of our favorite tools.""Testing against multiple run times, versions, and environments is a plus point with the additional pipelines making it more interesting to see what is happening across your development process in a single pane of glass."

More JFrog Pipeline Pros →

Cons
"The solution’s pricing could be better.""There needs to be some improvement in the user interface of CircleCI.""Integration with Microsoft Azure is one area for improvement. Azure is growing in its user base, and supports various cloud infrastructure components such as Service Fabric, App Service, etc. Some of Azure’s deployment models (like Kudu) require a steep learning curve, but if CircleCI would come up with such features (deployment to App Service) out of the box, it would be amazing.""Billing is a mess."

More CircleCI Cons →

"They could work on reducing the number of permissions required while using Bitbucket."

More JFrog Pipeline Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price of CircleCI could be less expensive."
  • More CircleCI Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is the cheapest compared to the other platforms out there."
  • More JFrog Pipeline Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution offers continuous integration and continuous delivery.
    Top Answer:Beware of skyrocketing bills as CircleCI does not provide transparency into how they charge refills. Their monthly billing statement is almost unreadable and their online dashboard doesn't provide… more »
    Top Answer:We've had occasional connectivity issues with cloud resources and build failure due to its own internal system setup and environment. That costs us credits. Support engineers do not thoroughly read… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    11th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    1,878
    Comparisons
    1,711
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    342
    Rating
    4.0
    22nd
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    303
    Comparisons
    280
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    TeamCity logo
    Compared 32% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 21% of the time.
    Jenkins logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    GitHub Actions logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    AWS CodeBuild logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Jenkins logo
    Compared 52% of the time.
    Bamboo logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Harness logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    TeamCity logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    GitHub Actions logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Shippable
    Learn More
    Overview
    CircleCI's continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. CircleCI offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp quickly, scale easily, and build confidently every day.
    JFrog Pipelines empowers software teams to ship updates faster by automating DevOps processes in a continuously streamlined and secure way across all their teams and tools. Encompassing continuous integration (CI), continuous delivery (CD), infrastructure and more, it automates everything from code to production. Pipelines is natively integrated with the JFrog Platform and is available with both cloud (software-as-a-service) and on-prem subscriptions.
    Sample Customers
    Shopify, Zenefits, Concur Technologies, CyberAgent
    SAP, Today Tix, Cisco, Lithium, Pushspring, Packet
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise60%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CircleCI is ranked 11th in Build Automation with 5 reviews while JFrog Pipeline is ranked 22nd in Build Automation. CircleCI is rated 6.6, while JFrog Pipeline is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CircleCI writes "Unhelpful support, unclear billing, and has offers ability to track usage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JFrog Pipeline writes "Testing against multiple run times, versions, and environments is a plus point". CircleCI is most compared with TeamCity, Tekton, Jenkins, GitHub Actions and AWS CodeBuild, whereas JFrog Pipeline is most compared with Jenkins, Bamboo, Harness, TeamCity and GitHub Actions.

    See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.