Compare Cisco CloudCenter vs. VMware vRealize Automation (vRA)
Cisco CloudCenter is ranked 6th in Cloud Management with 1 review while VMware vRealize Automation (vRA) is ranked 2nd in Cloud Management with 70 reviews. Cisco CloudCenter is rated 8.0, while VMware vRealize Automation (vRA) is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco CloudCenter writes "Provides a single pane of glass to enable us to provide infrastructure services to our clients". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware vRealize Automation (vRA) writes "Enables us to flex up or flex down the environment quickly; makes our DevOps processes more consistent". Cisco CloudCenter is most compared with VMware vRealize Automation (vRA), Cisco UCS Director and Red Hat CloudForms, whereas VMware vRealize Automation (vRA) is most compared with vCloud Director, Red Hat CloudForms and VMware vRealize Operations (vROps).
 |
Most Helpful Review | |||||
|
| ||||
 Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Turbonomic, Apache and others in Cloud Management. Updated: November 2019. 382,547 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
Upgrades are very simple as well because they've allowed us to get updates directly in the CloudCenter Suite manager. If you need to do an upgrade to your setup afterward, you just push a button and it rolls out the parts and retires the old ones. It's seamless and very simple compared to what we've done before. | The most valued feature is the streamlining of the DevOps process, automation and orchestration. It provides the ability for the entire Dev lifecycle to actually be incorporated into a single stream. For repeated installations and provisioning of VMs, we now have a clear definition of what has been installed, and we can monitor all that stuff. The initial setup was straightforward. It's easy to deploy. Before it would take months to deploy a VM, now, with this solution, we can deploy many VMs in one hour. We can do a stack of them with Mediaware. The setup was complex in many ways. The first reason is that we have many teams who work on it so it gets complicated gathering all of the people. The second reason is that it can be complicated to install it quickly, within a reasonable amount of time. The setup was straightforward. We upgraded to a newer version seamlessly. It worked really well. We haven't hit any limits yet, scalability is good. The whole VMR ecosystem allows us to serve multiple customers, multiple organizations and also multiple units per customer. We can cover every level without using the whole VRA and the rest of the ecosystem. We don't need to use a separate product to provide separate functionalities for the customer. We can cover all the use cases using only one product on our side which is really helpful. T |
Cons | |
The improvement I would like to see is not one thing particular to CloudCenter. I'd say it's more of a message that the system is still using a lot of the different products and if they would all just fit better together, they all could be faster together. | We still struggle a little bit with the configuration as far as making sure that we have all the endpoints where they need to be, because that's not as agile as we'd like in the back-end. We're working towards that with our DevOps teams to make sure that we're touching the right endpoints and getting the right data. in general, it took us a long time to get it off the ground. We had a lot of issues upfront and we determined that we just needed to scrap it. I think we scrapped it two or three times before we actually got it built the way we wanted, and we're still not where we need to be. We have had downtime. There have been some issues, but we're also two iterations behind on version. The most important thing that we missed in vRanger was the possibility to mount several images instantaneously and present it so we can run it immediately. The initial setup was complex because we have a high availability cluster. Especially when it comes to upgrades, we have a lot of downtimes and problems. The upgrade experience has been painful. 7.5 is not user-friendly, in fact, it's a nightmare. They changed everything on the graphic user interface, the mode where the user interacts with the product. I have not found this solution to be user-friendly. It's really complicated. The demo shows that you can automate anything but they only show basic scenarios. If you want to do anything more complicated than that, it becomes very complicated to set up. It's not cheap. I would like to see more automation, more ways to automate automation tasks. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
Information Not Available | It made the provisioning of the virtual machines easier and faster. We can react more quickly to customers' demands. A simplified version for small businesses would be good. We do plan to see ROI with any new implementation of new technologies being implemented within our environment. As far as value is concerned, it has been essential to our environment. We have been able to deploy VMs quickly and the developers have their own sandbox, so they can spin up and destroy VMs at their own will. There is confusion between licensing levels. There are three different licensed versions of vRealize Automation, and there are different things which can happen in each of them. vRealize automation really should be a front door to the whole VMware suite of products. The solution has helped to increase infrastructure, agility, speed, and provisioning in the time to market. We have seen significant ROI. We used to have physical servers, it took 90 days to get a server, order it, buy it, and get it in. We have it down to 10 minutes, building a server with virtualization, and now that's too slow. So, we let the customer do it at their speed. Therefore, it is pretty much up in a couple of minutes and they have a server. |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs. 382,547 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 4,638 Comparisons 3,211 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 2,750 Avg. Rating 8.0 | Views 15,797 Comparisons 8,919 Reviews 69 Average Words per Review 614 Avg. Rating 8.0 |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 23% of the time.  Compared 13% of the time.  Compared 10% of the time. | Compared 25% of the time. Compared 14% of the time. Compared 11% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| CliQr, CliQr CloudCenter | VMware vRealize Automation, vRA, VMware DynamicOps Cloud Suite |
Learn | |
| Cisco | VMware |
Overview | |
The Cisco CloudCenter solution is an application-centric hybrid cloud management platform that securely provisions infrastructure resources and deploys applications to data center, private cloud, and public cloud environments. With Cisco CloudCenter breakthrough application-centric technology, users
| VMware vRealize Automation automates the delivery of personalized infrastructure, applications and custom IT services. This cloud automation software lets you deploy across a multi-vendor hybrid cloud infrastructure, giving you both flexibility and investment protection for current and future technology choices. Agility Through Automation Automate the end-to-end delivery and management of infrastructure, and accelerate application deployment and releases. Choice Through Flexibility Provision and manage multivendor, multicloud infrastructure and applications by leveraging existing infrastructure, tools and processes. Personalization Through Governance Policies Ensure that users receive the right size resource or application at the appropriate service level for the jobs they need to perform. Efficiency Through Cost Containment Provide consistent, automated delivery and management of IT services and reduce time-consuming, manual processes. Reclaim inactive resources for reuse with automated reclamation, providing cost savings. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Cisco CloudCenter | Learn more about VMware vRealize Automation (vRA) |
Sample Customers | |
| NTT, Baylor College of Medicine (BCM), CollabNet, Pratt & Miller, PZFlex | Rent-a-Center, Amway, Vistra Energy, Liberty Mutual |
Top Industries | |
Comms Service Provider37% Software R&D Company21% Government12% Media Company6% | Financial Services Firm20% Healthcare Company16% Retailer10% Comms Service Provider10% Software R&D Company41% Comms Service Provider15% Pharma/Biotech Company9% Financial Services Firm6% |
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Turbonomic, Apache and others in Cloud Management. Updated: November 2019.
382,547 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also Cisco CloudCenter Reviews, VMware vRealize Automation (vRA) Reviews, and our list of Best Cloud Management Companies.
We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign in to see all reviews and comparisons. It's free!
By clicking Sign in with LinkedIn™ you agree to let IT Central Station use your LinkedIn profile
and email address in accordance with our Privacy Policy and agree to the Terms of Service.
- Unlimited access to 31000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Join a community of experts to call upon for support
Already a member? Sign in.
By registering, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
- Unlimited access to 31000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Join a community of experts to call upon for support
Already a member? Sign In.