"The scalability is one of the best."
"ObserveIT is small, easy to use, easy to deploy, and is not complicated, so it's more generally suited for only SMBs. It's a good value with a cheaper price."
"We don't always know what the configurations are all about. They change the configuration possibilities all of the time and we don't always get the same results."
"ObserveIT is not scalable and it's not for the medium to large corporations. It's for the smaller environments. For the larger corporations, we have other scalable solutions."
Earn 20 points
Cisco CMX Analytics [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in User Activity Monitoring while ObserveIT is ranked 2nd in User Activity Monitoring. Cisco CMX Analytics [EOL] is rated 6.0, while ObserveIT is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco CMX Analytics [EOL] writes "Good for IoT devices and occupation-calculations, but there are issues with stability and it is not user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ObserveIT writes "Easy to implement and configure. Ticketing and incident workflow can be improved. ". Cisco CMX Analytics [EOL] is most compared with , whereas ObserveIT is most compared with Teramind, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Ekran System, Splunk User Behavior Analytics and Dtex Systems.
See our list of best User Activity Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all User Activity Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
