Cisco Network Assurance Engine vs Fortinet FortiPlanner [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Network Assurance Engine and Fortinet FortiPlanner [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Ekahau, NetAlly, iBwave and others in Network Modeling and Simulation.
To learn more, read our detailed Network Modeling and Simulation Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Fortinet FortiPlanner [EOL]?
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Modeling and Simulation solutions are best for your needs.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:The standout feature of Cisco Network Assurance Engine is its ability to proactively detect and prevent network issues before they occur.
Top Answer:To enhance Cisco Network Assurance Engine, simplifying its interface and making it more user-friendly would be beneficial. This would enable a wider range of users, including those with basic… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
67
Comparisons
10
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
370
Rating
7.0
Unranked
In Network Modeling and Simulation
Comparisons
Also Known As
Cisco NAE, Candid
Learn More
Overview

Cisco Network Assurance Engine (NAE) transforms operations in data center networks to a fundamentally more proactive model. Built on Cisco’s patented network verification technology, it is the most comprehensive assurance engine that mathematically verifies the entire network for correctness, giving operators confidence that their network is always operating consistent with intent.

Simplify WLAN planning and deployment with our graphical Wireless LAN planning and post-deployment site survey tool. Using FortiPlanner ensures planning accuracy through sophisticated signal propagation ray-tracing algorithms. After deployment, a real-time coverage heat map shows you areas that need fine-tuning, such as coverage holes or especially congested areas.

Sample Customers
West Corporation, Axians Nordic, Robert Bosch, DICTU, Tenaris
Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data
Buyer's Guide
Network Modeling and Simulation
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Ekahau, NetAlly, iBwave and others in Network Modeling and Simulation. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cisco Network Assurance Engine is ranked 5th in Network Modeling and Simulation with 4 reviews while Fortinet FortiPlanner [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Modeling and Simulation. Cisco Network Assurance Engine is rated 8.0, while Fortinet FortiPlanner [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Network Assurance Engine writes "Helps to easily detect and resolve issues like security threats, bandwidth usage concerns, and performance bottlenecks". On the other hand, Cisco Network Assurance Engine is most compared with , whereas Fortinet FortiPlanner [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Network Modeling and Simulation vendors.

We monitor all Network Modeling and Simulation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.