Compare Cisco Stealthwatch vs. Flowmon Collector

Cisco Stealthwatch is ranked 1st in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software with 39 reviews while Flowmon Collector is ranked 78th in Network Monitoring Software. Cisco Stealthwatch is rated 8.0, while Flowmon Collector is rated 0. The top reviewer of Cisco Stealthwatch writes "You are able to drill down into a center's utilization, then create reports based on it". On the other hand, Cisco Stealthwatch is most compared with Darktrace, Splunk User Behavior Analytics and Cisco Stealthwatch Cloud, whereas Flowmon Collector is most compared with Cisco Stealthwatch, Plixer Scrutinizer and Fortinet FortiSIEM (AccelOps).
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Stealthwatch Logo
24,412 views|15,040 comparisons
Flowmon Collector Logo
267 views|207 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Flowmon Collector? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Darktrace, GFI and others in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software. Updated: January 2020.
391,045 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Our fees are approximately $3,000 USD.Licensing is on a yearly basis.We pay for support costs on a yearly basis.On a yearly basis, licensing is somewhere around $30,000.The yearly licensing cost is about $50,000.The pricing for this solution is good.The licensing costs are outrageous.Today, we are part of the big Cisco ELA, and it is a la carte. We can get orders for whatever we want. At the end of the day, we have to pay for it in one big expense, but that is fine. We are okay with that.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software solutions are best for your needs.
391,045 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
24,412
Comparisons
15,040
Reviews
39
Average Words per Review
524
Avg. Rating
8.1
Views
267
Comparisons
207
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 25% of the time.
Also Known As
Cisco Stealthwatch Enterprise, Lancope StealthWatch
Learn
Cisco
Flowmon Networks
Overview

Cisco Stealthwatch uses NetFlow to provide visibility across the network, data center, branch offices, and cloud. Its advanced security analytics uncover stealthy attacks on the extended network. Stealthwatch helps you use your existing network as a security sensor and enforcer to dramatically improve your threat defense.

Flowmon Collector is a powerful standalone appliance providing detailed network traffic visibility. The solution is dedicated for collection, visualization, analysis and long-term storage of network statistics (NetFlow v5/v9, IPFIX and other flow data) generated from routers, switches, firewalls or specialized Flowmon Probes. With a well-arranged user interface it allows administrators to have absolute control over the network to troubleshoot operational issues quickly, enhance network & application performance and deal with modern cyber threats.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Stealthwatch
Learn more about Flowmon Collector
Sample Customers
Edge Web Hosting, Telenor Norway, Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana, Webster Financial Corporation, Westinghouse Electric, VMware, TIAA-CREFSEGA
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company25%
Financial Services Firm14%
Manufacturing Company8%
Pharma/Biotech Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider24%
Software R&D Company14%
Government7%
Financial Services Firm7%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Darktrace, GFI and others in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software. Updated: January 2020.
391,045 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.