Compare Cisco Stealthwatch vs. LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA

Cisco Stealthwatch is ranked 1st in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software with 39 reviews while LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA is ranked 15th in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 1 review. Cisco Stealthwatch is rated 8.0, while LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Stealthwatch writes "You are able to drill down into a center's utilization, then create reports based on it". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA writes "A solution with a good interface and great reporting features but in need of better technical support". Cisco Stealthwatch is most compared with Darktrace, Splunk User Behavior Analytics and Cisco Stealthwatch Cloud, whereas LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA is most compared with Darktrace, Cisco Stealthwatch and Splunk User Behavior Analytics.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Darktrace, GFI and others in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software. Updated: December 2019.
389,722 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature is anomaly detection, where it finds things that are not allowed internally.Most of the engineers I've worked with have been really good. Very knowledgeable and easy to work with.Being able to graph and show data to management has improved our organization. We can show the data to the higher-ups. It shows them that it's picking up on these anomalies and doing its job.It's a dependable product that is able to pinpoint where we have vulnerabilities if they occur.Using the Cognitive Analytics feature, we have complete visibility that we didn’t have before.The most valuable feature about this solution is that it gives me insight of my network.It has improved our internal knowledge of what's going on with the network, and that's helpful.The most valuable features of this solution are the logging, keeping threats under control, and keeping our data and environment secure.

Read more »

The solution's most valuable features are the graphical user interface and the reporting.

Read more »

Cons
The usability of this solution needs to be improved.We've run into some issues with the configuration.They should include Citrix VDIs in the next release.The GUI could use some improvement. Being able to find features more easily would be a great improvement if it was simplified.The initial setup is complex, as there is a lot to configure.It hasn't really improved our direct detection rate but it has definitely reduced our incident response time as we wouldn't have been able to detect threats or immediate risks without this solution.I would like to see more and cleaner reporting. For example, if I pull up Steven and I want to look and maybe compare him to what you've done in the past week, and compare that to the past six months, the point would be to see what the difference in activity looks like over this time. I don't see that capability in reporting to date. You see that trend but you don't really see a straightforward comparison. That right there is key to what we want to see about the normal activity.It is time-consuming to set it up and understand how the tool works.

Read more »

The search feature needs to be improved.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Our fees are approximately $3,000 USD.Licensing is on a yearly basis.We pay for support costs on a yearly basis.On a yearly basis, licensing is somewhere around $30,000.The yearly licensing cost is about $50,000.The pricing for this solution is good.The licensing costs are outrageous.Today, we are part of the big Cisco ELA, and it is a la carte. We can get orders for whatever we want. At the end of the day, we have to pay for it in one big expense, but that is fine. We are okay with that.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software solutions are best for your needs.
389,722 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
24,412
Comparisons
15,040
Reviews
39
Average Words per Review
524
Avg. Rating
8.1
Views
1,308
Comparisons
1,010
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
200
Avg. Rating
6.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 25% of the time.
Also Known As
Cisco Stealthwatch Enterprise, Lancope StealthWatchLogRhythm CloudAI, LogRhythm UEBA
Learn
Cisco
LogRhythm
Overview

Cisco Stealthwatch uses NetFlow to provide visibility across the network, data center, branch offices, and cloud. Its advanced security analytics uncover stealthy attacks on the extended network. Stealthwatch helps you use your existing network as a security sensor and enforcer to dramatically improve your threat defense.

LogRhythm UEBA enables your security team to quickly and effectively detect, respond to, and neutralize both known and unknown threats. Providing evidence-based starting points for investigation, it employs a combination of scenario analytics techniques (e.g., statistical analysis, rate analysis, trend analysis, advanced correlation), and both supervised and unsupervised machine learning (ML).

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Stealthwatch
Learn more about LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA
Sample Customers
Edge Web Hosting, Telenor Norway, Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana, Webster Financial Corporation, Westinghouse Electric, VMware, TIAA-CREF
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company25%
Financial Services Firm14%
Manufacturing Company8%
Retailer6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider24%
Software R&D Company14%
Government7%
Financial Services Firm7%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Darktrace, GFI and others in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software. Updated: December 2019.
389,722 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.