Compare Cisco UCS B-Series vs. NEC Sigmablade-M

Cisco UCS B-Series is ranked 3rd in Blade Servers with 2 reviews while NEC Sigmablade-M which is ranked 20th in Blade Servers. Cisco UCS B-Series is rated 8.6, while NEC Sigmablade-M is rated 0. The top reviewer of Cisco UCS B-Series writes "The separation of the hardware from the components' software definition is key for us". On the other hand, Cisco UCS B-Series is most compared with HPE Synergy, HPE BladeSystem and Super Micro SuperBlade, whereas NEC Sigmablade-M is most compared with Dell PowerEdge M.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use NEC Sigmablade-M? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE BladeSystem and other solutions. Updated: July 2019.
360,582 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
The type of service level purchase will determine the level of support response that you receive from Cisco.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
360,582 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
3rd
out of 25 in Blade Servers
Views
8,680
Comparisons
2,511
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
411
Avg. Rating
8.5
20th
out of 25 in Blade Servers
Views
228
Comparisons
81
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 55% of the time.
Compared 100% of the time.
Also Known As
UCS B-Series, Unified Computing System B-SeriesSigmablade-M
Learn
Cisco
NEC
Overview
Based on Intel Xeon processor E7 and E5 product families, Cisco UCS B-Series Blade Servers work with virtualized and non-virtualized applications to increase: Performance, Energy efficiency, Flexibility and Administrator productivity.

The NEC SIGMABLADE-M is an 8-blade chassis that comprises 6U of rack space and offers a compact size that is ideal for mid-sized systems, easy monitoring of the status of each blade server, and better and easier cabling through the use of KVM switches.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco UCS B-Series
Learn more about NEC Sigmablade-M
Sample Customers
Aegean Motorway, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, Anonymous Banking Group, Artoni Transporti, Bellevue, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Hertz, Houston Methodist, Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Lufthansa Systems GmbH & Co.KG, Outscale, Sony Corporation, TalbotsSysmex Shanghai
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE BladeSystem and other solutions. Updated: July 2019.
360,582 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email