Compare Cisco UCS B-Series vs. NEC Sigmablade-M
Cisco UCS B-Series is ranked 3rd in Blade Servers with 2 reviews while NEC Sigmablade-M which is ranked 20th in Blade Servers. Cisco UCS B-Series is rated 8.6, while NEC Sigmablade-M is rated 0. The top reviewer of Cisco UCS B-Series writes "The separation of the hardware from the components' software definition is key for us". On the other hand, Cisco UCS B-Series is most compared with HPE Synergy, HPE BladeSystem and Super Micro SuperBlade, whereas NEC Sigmablade-M is most compared with Dell PowerEdge M.
Most Helpful Review | |||
| Use NEC Sigmablade-M? Share your opinion. | ||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE BladeSystem and other solutions. Updated: July 2019. 360,582 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
The type of service level purchase will determine the level of support response that you receive from Cisco. | Information Not Available |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs. 360,582 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 8,680 Comparisons 2,511 Reviews 2 Average Words per Review 411 Avg. Rating 8.5 | Views 228 Comparisons 81 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Avg. Rating N/A |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 55% of the time. Compared 17% of the time.  Compared 12% of the time. |  Compared 100% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| UCS B-Series, Unified Computing System B-Series | Sigmablade-M |
Learn | |
| Cisco | NEC |
Overview | |
| Based on Intel Xeon processor E7 and E5 product families, Cisco UCS B-Series Blade Servers work with virtualized and non-virtualized applications to increase: Performance, Energy efficiency, Flexibility and Administrator productivity. | The NEC SIGMABLADE-M is an 8-blade chassis that comprises 6U of rack space and offers a compact size that is ideal for mid-sized systems, easy monitoring of the status of each blade server, and better and easier cabling through the use of KVM switches. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Cisco UCS B-Series | Learn more about NEC Sigmablade-M |
Sample Customers | |
| Aegean Motorway, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, Anonymous Banking Group, Artoni Transporti, Bellevue, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Hertz, Houston Methodist, Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Lufthansa Systems GmbH & Co.KG, Outscale, Sony Corporation, Talbots | Sysmex Shanghai |
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE BladeSystem and other solutions. Updated: July 2019.
360,582 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also Cisco UCS B-Series Reviews, NEC Sigmablade-M Reviews, and our list of Best Blade Servers Companies.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign in to see all reviews and comparisons. It's free!
By clicking Sign in with LinkedIn™ you agree to let IT Central Station use your LinkedIn profile
and email address in accordance with our Privacy Policy and agree to the Terms of Service.
- Unlimited access to 28000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Networking events and peer-to-peer consultations
Already a member? Sign in.
By registering, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
- Unlimited access to 28000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Networking events and peer-to-peer consultations
Already a member? Sign In.