Clarive vs CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Clarive and CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
28th
out of 32 in Release Automation
Views
36
Comparisons
29
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Release Automation
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Elastic Server
Learn More
Overview

Clarive Software provides a DevOps platform for the evolving enterprise on every platform. Founded in 2010, the company is headquartered in Spain and today has offices in the US, Brazil, UK, and Belgium. Its senior management team has close to 20 years of practical experience in ALM, release and deployment management. Clarive is currently building up a strong partner channel to rapidly expand its success globally.

Clarive‘s solution is highly valued by several Fortune 100 global enterprises with critical and complex systems in the financial and telecom industry such as BNP Paribasand Telefónica, thanks to its configuration elasticity to adapt to complex processes and its high scalability. The success of Clarive also includes other worldwide clients such as Capgemini, Banc Sabadell, Banco Popular, Jazztel/Orange, RSI, and the Spanish Central Bank.


Elastic Server simplifies the process of creating application stacks for use on EC2 and other virtual environments. Instead of the painstaking manual downloading, configuration, building, and installation that is otherwise required when creating a complex stack, Elastic Server provides a menu-driven selection and build process.

Sample Customers
Banc Sabadell, Jazztel, VASS Group, TUI, Telefonica
Geezeo, PayNearMe, AngelEye Camera Systems, CodeObjects, Imagination, MTech Communications, Quantum Retail, Trek10, Foley Carrier Services
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Clarive is ranked 28th in Release Automation while CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Release Automation. Clarive is rated 0.0, while CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Clarive is most compared with , whereas CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] is most compared with .

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.