Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Oracle Dyn Web Application Security comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cloudflare Web Application Firewall and Oracle Dyn Web Application Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution protects our application, which runs on the HTTP protocol, from DDoS attacks.""The product has a valuable security control functionality.""Caching is the most valuable feature of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall.""Someone with a basic understanding of networking and security will be able to implement the firewall's basic features within 15 minutes.""I'm highly satisfied. It's remarkably user-friendly, enabling me to quickly identify issues, and deploy solutions, and it offers the necessary features.""The product has improved our security posture by blocking bad actors.""We like that there's load balancing, firewall capabilities, DDoS protection, et cetera, all covered by Cloudflare.""The security features are valuable. The particular feature we use is called OWASP."

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Pros →

"The initial setup is pretty easy."

More Oracle Dyn Web Application Security Pros →

Cons
"The accuracy of the Cloudflare Web Application Firewall could be improved by reducing the number of false-negative alerts.""It would be ideal if the solution offered better log integration and more integration with different platforms.""The blocked logs are difficult to read at times.""The ModSecurity core rules need to be updated.""They have some limitations with third-party integrations.""The platform's control features related to real-time authentication and response time need improvement.""Their documentation could be better. They don't have documentation that explains everything well. They have documentation for everything you're looking for, but they lack a single piece of documentation to tie everything together. As a new user or beginner, it took us a little bit of time to figure out how to put all these things in place.""Its stability could be better."

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Cons →

"The solution should have a Data Mask for the next release. It would be helpful for banking institutions as they would be able to hide the server number of the ATM machine in the CPU."

More Oracle Dyn Web Application Security Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing model is very straightforward compared to the competition. You just pay per month for the product and usage."
  • "We pay $210 per month for CloudFlare WAF."
  • "The annual licensing fee is $10,000 USD."
  • "Cloudflare offers different types of subscriptions for businesses, enterprises, and personal users, and the pricing is negotiable."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? I believe the pricing is not the best, but it's reasonable and acceptable. We also use the McAfee system in parallel. In terms of pricing, its okay - not great, but not bad either. It falls in the middle, which is acceptable. In terms of support licensing, last time, we were searching for a solution, and we considered products from resellers rather than directly from the cloud provider. However, the pricing we encountered was exceptionally high. As a result, we are inclined to select support from the reseller."
  • "The solution's pricing option needs to be more transparent for enterprise clients."
  • "Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is more affordable than other solutions."
  • More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product has a valuable security control functionality.
    Top Answer:Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is more affordable than other solutions.
    Top Answer:The platform's control features related to real-time authentication and response time need improvement.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    8,623
    Comparisons
    6,257
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    376
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    106
    Comparisons
    87
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Cloudflare WAF
    Dyn Web Application Security, Zenedge
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's intuitive dashboard enables users to build powerful rules through easy clicks and also provides Terraform integration. Every request to the WAF is inspected against the rule engine and the threat intelligence curated from protecting over 27 Million websites. Suspicious requests can be blocked, challenged or logged as per the needs of the user while legitimate requests are routed to the destination, agnostic of whether it lives on-premise or in the cloud. Analytics and Cloudflare Logs enable visibility into actionable metrics for the user.

    ZENEDGE offers total security for your Web applications and networks, identifying threat actors, and stopping malicious bot traffic and DDoS attacks from reaching your servers. Malicious traffic is intercepted at the edge of the network by the ZENEDGE cybersecurity platform, stopping it from ever reaching your web application or network, ensuring continued uptime and normal operations. Ongoing monitoring, threat intel and regular security updates protect against new zero-day vulnerabilities.

    Sample Customers
    crunchbase, udacity, marketo, okcupid, zendesk
    FoodStorm, Soccer Shots
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Insurance Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization25%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business61%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise28%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise35%
    Large Enterprise42%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is ranked 7th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 16 reviews while Oracle Dyn Web Application Security is ranked 49th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is rated 8.2, while Oracle Dyn Web Application Security is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall writes "A cloud solution for web application firewall protection with rate-limiting, managed, and custom firewall rules". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Dyn Web Application Security writes "Very secure with an easy initial setup and pretty stable". Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is most compared with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Akamai App and API Protector, AWS WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Azure Front Door, whereas Oracle Dyn Web Application Security is most compared with .

    See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.